2008
DOI: 10.3386/w14356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Experiments in Economics: The Past, The Present, and The Future

Abstract: We thank Glenn Harrison, the editor Esther Gal-Or, an anonymous associate editor, and an anonymous referee for astute comments that improved this paper. The views expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…"By a well-known statistical theorem s 2 z = s 2 x + s 2 y + 2r xy s x s y where r xy is the correlation coefficient between X and Y" (Friedman,. Other things equal, the effect of the "stabilizing" action depends in large part on the magnitude of the correlation coefficient, just as Friedman and others after Student and Pearson have demonstrated in a vast body of literature ignored by new field experimentalists, notably, Levitt and List (2009), Banerjee and Duflo (2011), and Karlan and List (2007). 79 Student (1923), p. 273. even from inch to inch.…”
Section: Pearson's Illustration Of the Higher Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…"By a well-known statistical theorem s 2 z = s 2 x + s 2 y + 2r xy s x s y where r xy is the correlation coefficient between X and Y" (Friedman,. Other things equal, the effect of the "stabilizing" action depends in large part on the magnitude of the correlation coefficient, just as Friedman and others after Student and Pearson have demonstrated in a vast body of literature ignored by new field experimentalists, notably, Levitt and List (2009), Banerjee and Duflo (2011), and Karlan and List (2007). 79 Student (1923), p. 273. even from inch to inch.…”
Section: Pearson's Illustration Of the Higher Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other primary sources include: published articles, scientific notebooks, memoranda, and correspondence 24 as well as annual reports, brewers' reports, and financial statements. 22 Most field experiments in economics published since the 1990s are unaware of the bias and cost introduced to their experiments by artificial randomization: see, for example, Levitt and List (2009). Contrast Ziliak ( , 2010, Harrison (2011), andBruhn andMcKenzie (2009).…”
Section: Note On Methods and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One way to account for counterfactual development is to conduct studies in which the circumstances affecting firm behavior are controlled. Experiments, both laboratory and field experiments, are therefore becoming more popular in economic research as they enable researchers to assess, for instance, the impact of a specific regulatory measure on firm behavior, holding all other factors equal (Levitt and List 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%