2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2007.07.087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field failure mechanism and improvement of EOS failure of integrated IGBT inverter modules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This variation in degradation behavior makes accurate prognostics for maintenance or replacement extremely difficult. However, some of this variation may be partially explained by Jeong et al [96], who showed that IGBTs can be subject to electrostatic discharge (ESD) on the manufacturing line during heat sink and inverter assembly. This ESD adds a resistive element that can lower the thyristor turn-on threshold and increase gate leakage current of affected devices.…”
Section: Electrical Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation in degradation behavior makes accurate prognostics for maintenance or replacement extremely difficult. However, some of this variation may be partially explained by Jeong et al [96], who showed that IGBTs can be subject to electrostatic discharge (ESD) on the manufacturing line during heat sink and inverter assembly. This ESD adds a resistive element that can lower the thyristor turn-on threshold and increase gate leakage current of affected devices.…”
Section: Electrical Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Potentially, Buck-Boost DC-DC transformerless converters can face short-circuit failure modes under certain conditions. Sources [21][22][23][24][25][26] offer significant information in this direction as follows: IGBT structural behavior under short-circuit [21]; breakdown and thermal runaway mechanisms leading to destructive failure [22]; damages from electrostatic discharge [23]; IGBTs' mechanical stress under short-circuit conditions [24]; turn-off failure mechanism [25]; robustness of IGBT modules during turn-off commutation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant failure mechanisms include fatigue, latch-up, electrostatic discharge (ESD), radiation-induced effect, and ceramic substrate fracture (Oh, Han, McCluskey, Han, & Youn, 2015). Fatigue failure can occur due to the thermal cycling (Celnikier, Benabou, Dupont, & Coquery, 2011), while latchup can happen due to mishandling of the devices (Jeong, Hong, & Park, 2007). From maintenance histories in the field, electrical overloads that exceed the maximum rating of IGBTs for very short duration were reported to be most predominant (Lee, Oh, Park, Youn, Kim, Kim, & Cho, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%