2003
DOI: 10.3233/thc-2003-11408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field flatness and symmetry of photon beams: Review of the current recommendations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The acceptance tolerance of the beam symmetry and flatness should not exceed 3%. The beam is more symmetric and flattened at higher energies, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] which is well in agreement with our results, as our symmetry and flatness value did not exceed 3% for red and green channels, and also symmetry and flatness were better at high energies except in some cases. The results are in agreement with those of Sahani et al 33 and define the acceptance criteria of photon beam characteristics such as for symmetry, flatness and penumbra for pre-machine commissioning and for QC purposes at different energies and field sizes using International Electro Technical Commission (IEC 60976, 2008), which ensures that there is only a small negligible difference between calculated and measured data using two detectors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The acceptance tolerance of the beam symmetry and flatness should not exceed 3%. The beam is more symmetric and flattened at higher energies, [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] which is well in agreement with our results, as our symmetry and flatness value did not exceed 3% for red and green channels, and also symmetry and flatness were better at high energies except in some cases. The results are in agreement with those of Sahani et al 33 and define the acceptance criteria of photon beam characteristics such as for symmetry, flatness and penumbra for pre-machine commissioning and for QC purposes at different energies and field sizes using International Electro Technical Commission (IEC 60976, 2008), which ensures that there is only a small negligible difference between calculated and measured data using two detectors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The computer-controlled radiation field analyser system is used as a dose profile verification tool. Owing to this time-consuming procedure, it is not feasible for medical physicists to use this as a daily dose quality assurance testing method in radiotherapy departments 8 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 The symmetry values do not show any significant dependence on the depth, energy of the photon beams and the field sizes. 6 Kouloulias et al 15 stated that both homogeneity and symmetry are considered as the quality determining factor of the photon beam delivered from linear accelerators. Galiano et al 16 proposed the notions for symmetry and homogeneity of beam dose, which were an extension of the description of both of these tools of dosimetry and these are given in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 MV photon beam characteristics at 10 cmFigure 2. 15 MV beam profile at 10 cm depth for 10 × 10 cm 2 field size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%