1999
DOI: 10.1080/00150199908016999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field induced structural phase transition in layered compounds MR(MoO4)2 (M = K, Cs; R = Er, Tm)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the magnetic field further generates the CEF level crossing at 25 T observed in the magnetization measurements. This field-induced sequence of transitions is consistent with the extremely low energy gap ∆ = 1.6 meV between the CEF ground state doublet and first excited state 47 . Therefore, a pseudo Jahn-Teller distortion incorporating the J z = 15 2 and J z = 13 2 CEF levels, as illustrated in Figure 8, is a viable mechanism for inducing ferroelectricity in this material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Increasing the magnetic field further generates the CEF level crossing at 25 T observed in the magnetization measurements. This field-induced sequence of transitions is consistent with the extremely low energy gap ∆ = 1.6 meV between the CEF ground state doublet and first excited state 47 . Therefore, a pseudo Jahn-Teller distortion incorporating the J z = 15 2 and J z = 13 2 CEF levels, as illustrated in Figure 8, is a viable mechanism for inducing ferroelectricity in this material.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The field dependence for this orientation does not exhibit any hysteresis when increasing and decreasing magnetic field. This finding is in disagreement with results of Khastko et al 4 The field dependence of the b-axis magnetization measured with increasing and decreasing field shown in Fig. 3 exhibits weak hysteresis at 4.2 K. At lower or higher temperatures no hysteresis could be discerned.…”
Section: A Magnetization and Magnetic Susceptibility Of Ker(moo 4 )contrasting
confidence: 87%
“…1-4͒ suggest that the magnetic phase transition to an antiferromagnetic ͑AF͒ ordered state takes place at T N = 0.95 K Ϯ 0.01 K. According to Khatsko et al, 3 KEr͑MoO 4 ͒ 2 system does not exhibit a spontaneous Jahn-Teller effect on cooling down to 0.5 K in zero field, however, in paramagnetic region above T N considerable changes in magnetic properties connected with the structural phase transitions are induced by moderate fields. 4 Below T N , a noncollinear zero-field AF structure, in Refs. 1 and 2 named as 6AF-12, with magnetic moments lying in the ac plane and having an angle of about 9°with respect to the c-axis direction has been suggested by Anders et al This, however, has been suggested on the basis of theoretical calculations and electron-paramagnetic-resonance experiments only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic spectrum of rare-earth ions in the crystalline field usually has lowlying excited levels, and that leads to the possibility of reorganization of the corresponding electronic states both by an external magnetic field and by displacements of the ions. This is responsible, in particular, for the magneticfield-induced structural phase transitions observed in various compounds of this class [1][2][3][4][5]. In the case of nonKramers rare-earth ions the lowest electronic state often form a quasi-doublet with a gap Δ of the order of few K, well separated from the rest of the spectrum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements were carried out with a SQUID magnetometer developed at the Institute Néel equipped with a miniature 3 He- 4 He dilution refrigerator allowing measurements down to 70 mK.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%