2017
DOI: 10.1080/02678292.2017.1404151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field-induced uniaxial and biaxial nematic phases in the Maier–Saupe–Zwanzig (MSZ) lattice model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of a tricritical point on the line of biaxial to paranematic phase transitions is compatible with the predictions of [16], which assumes a more restrictive pair interaction independent of a biaxiality parameter, as well as with those of [6], in which nematogens are intrinsically uniaxial. In the latter case, the located tricritical point is observed for χ < 0 and at the value of the magnetic field necessary for our tricritical point to reach the uniaxial limit ∆ = 0; see the inset in Figure 2b.…”
Section: Phase Diagrams In a Fieldsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of a tricritical point on the line of biaxial to paranematic phase transitions is compatible with the predictions of [16], which assumes a more restrictive pair interaction independent of a biaxiality parameter, as well as with those of [6], in which nematogens are intrinsically uniaxial. In the latter case, the located tricritical point is observed for χ < 0 and at the value of the magnetic field necessary for our tricritical point to reach the uniaxial limit ∆ = 0; see the inset in Figure 2b.…”
Section: Phase Diagrams In a Fieldsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similarly, the critical field associated with a critical end point of the first-order transition line between the uniaxial and the paranematic phases, which has been observed for a fixed biaxiality parameter by various authors [6,11,12,15,31], corresponds to the value of the field, which makes our simple critical point reach the uniaxial limit ∆ = 0 for χ > 0; see the inset in Figure 2a. Again, the same qualitative behavior for the appearance of a critical end point in the uniaxial-paranematic transition was predicted for hard rods or hard plates with χ > 0 [32].…”
Section: Phase Diagrams In a Fieldsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…). The uniaxial nematic to biaxial nematic (N U −N B ) phase transition in the presence of an external field also studied theoretically [26,43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intersection of the critical line (E 1 = 1, green) with the limit of stability of the biaxial solution (E 2 = 0; blue, dot-dashed) defines a tricritical point. A number of calculations [23][24][25], including our own work for the Maier-Saupe-Zwanzig lattice model [16], indicate that the qualitative features of the stress-temperature phase diagram, for sufficiently small values of the coupling ω, are also present in the field-temperature phase diagram of a uniaxial nematic system.…”
Section: B Biaxial Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive values of this susceptibility (χ a > 0) correspond to positive tensions (extension) in the elastic model. In the phase diagrams, either in terms of stress or in terms of fields and temperature, there is a line of first-order transitions that ends at a simple critical point [16]. Negative values of the susceptibility (χ a < 0) lead to a field-induced biaxial phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%