1987
DOI: 10.1021/es00161a006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field intercomparison of five types of fog water collectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volume of air swept by the collector is about 6.5 m 3 min-• and the mean collection efficiency calculated after Ranz and Wong [1952] is 90% for d > 8 /•m and 20% for d = 5/•m. The ASRC collector was recently deployed in the field during an intercomparison study of fog water sampling devices and is described in a report of that study [Hering et al, 1987]. The FISBAT collector (Figure 3b) consists of a polyethylene frame connected to an arm rotating at 15 rpm.…”
Section: Winter Situationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The volume of air swept by the collector is about 6.5 m 3 min-• and the mean collection efficiency calculated after Ranz and Wong [1952] is 90% for d > 8 /•m and 20% for d = 5/•m. The ASRC collector was recently deployed in the field during an intercomparison study of fog water sampling devices and is described in a report of that study [Hering et al, 1987]. The FISBAT collector (Figure 3b) consists of a polyethylene frame connected to an arm rotating at 15 rpm.…”
Section: Winter Situationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…An active sampler based on a design by Global Geochemistry Corporation [Hering et al, 1987] was used. A fan is used to pull the fog through a thick mesh of polypropylene strands.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fog water condenses on the strands and runs down a Teflon-lined PVC pipe to a sample bottle at the bottom of a V-shaped configuration. Fog droplets larger than 5 •tm are sampled with at least 98% collection efficiency [Hering et al, 1987]. Samples are collected over a period ranging from 30 to 90 min, depending on the liquid water content of the fog, with denser fogs requiring less sampling time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it has been a priority to search for new supply systems to provide the water needed for arid or relatively dry sites, which are traditionally isolated from central water supplies. Among the systems proposed to address this shortage, fog catchers can provide a relatively accessible water supply in elevated zones, where a high proportion of this natural resource may be collected (Hering et al, 1987;Schemenauer and Cereceda, 1991;Fuzzi et al, 1997;Regalado and Ritter, 2016). A fog catcher can economically extract water that can be used by the surrounding villages (Pajares et al, 2011;WMO, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%