2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00773-016-0414-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field measurement and numerical study of tidal current turbulence intensity in the Kobe Strait of the Goto Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As presented in Sect. 1, turbulence intensities between 0.1 and 0.2 at P1 in Tanoura Strait are similar to the results for Sound of Islay in Scotland (0.12-0.13) [11] or Kobe Strait in Japan (0.15-0.17) [13]. As for P2 in the Naru Strait, the notable difference between the two tide directions has been also found in other areas with strong impact of geomorphologic conditions on the flow [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As presented in Sect. 1, turbulence intensities between 0.1 and 0.2 at P1 in Tanoura Strait are similar to the results for Sound of Islay in Scotland (0.12-0.13) [11] or Kobe Strait in Japan (0.15-0.17) [13]. As for P2 in the Naru Strait, the notable difference between the two tide directions has been also found in other areas with strong impact of geomorphologic conditions on the flow [12].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…As for P2 in the Naru Strait, the notable difference between the two tide directions has been also found in other areas with strong impact of geomorphologic conditions on the flow [12]. In terms of streamwise length scale, both P1 and P2 conditions are close to the measured in Kobe Strait, Goto Islands, for 2-m/s velocities in the ebb direction [13]. Values for flood tide in Kobe Strait (≈ 12 m), as well as for the point analysed by Milne et al [11] in the Sound of Islay (11-14 m), are significantly higher, but still comparable.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations