2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-00972-8_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Measurements to Investigate Submerged Slope Failures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The equation for the bank safety calculation for a liquefied flow slide (Van den Ham et al , ; Deltares, ) follows rightFSCliquefactionleft=Hnormalf242.5·5cotαnormalf5·11010(0.05+ψ)rightrightleft·VlocalVWS·SCavgLnormalmkm yr1 where ψ is the state parameter as a function of a cone penetration test according to the relation by Shuttle and Jefferies (), which is the average value of the state parameter in the soil layers between top and toe of the submerged slope, with a (cumulative) thickness of 5 m having the loosest packing (highest ψ ). A negative ψ indicates dense, dilative soils, whereas a positive ψ indicates loose contractive soils (see also Van Duinen et al , ). ψ is compared to the general value of 0.05 for the Western Scheldt (Van den Ham et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equation for the bank safety calculation for a liquefied flow slide (Van den Ham et al , ; Deltares, ) follows rightFSCliquefactionleft=Hnormalf242.5·5cotαnormalf5·11010(0.05+ψ)rightrightleft·VlocalVWS·SCavgLnormalmkm yr1 where ψ is the state parameter as a function of a cone penetration test according to the relation by Shuttle and Jefferies (), which is the average value of the state parameter in the soil layers between top and toe of the submerged slope, with a (cumulative) thickness of 5 m having the loosest packing (highest ψ ). A negative ψ indicates dense, dilative soils, whereas a positive ψ indicates loose contractive soils (see also Van Duinen et al , ). ψ is compared to the general value of 0.05 for the Western Scheldt (Van den Ham et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() argued that collapse of the slopes was dominated by breaching, there is no information on the actual process. Therefore, we considered that half of all flow slides were pure liquefaction flow slides, while the other half concerned pure breach flow slides (Van den Ham et al , , Van Duinen et al , ; Deltares, ). Eventually, the bank safety assessment could be written as follows: rightFSCleft=0.5HnormalR242.55cotαnormalR5+0.5HnormalR2455cotαnormalR5rightrightleft·VlocalVWSkm yr1 where the other variables are excluded, as these are considered to be constant within the Western Scheldt.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Dutch dredging industry in the 1970s first identified breaching as an important production mechanism for stationary suction hopper dredgers. Currently, breaching is incorporated into corresponding safety assessments of dikes in the Netherlands, as it is an important failure mechanism [8].…”
Section: Breaching Flow Slidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature reports many historical cases of large submarine flow slides worldwide (e.g., [3][4][5][6]). There is a long history of flow slide events in the Netherlands [7], particularly in the southwestern estuary of the Netherlands (Zeeland), where hundreds of flow slides have been observed since 1800 [8]. However, the observations were made after the flow slides had already occurred, as their timing is unpredictable, implying that the temporal development of the failure was not monitored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the 22 nd of July 2014, a large flow slide occurred along the tidal flat of Walsoorden profiling) were performed (Van Duinen et al, 2014). Pore-water pressure meters were installed in wells at 5m depth allowing continuous monitoring during the test (Mastbergen et al, 2016).…”
Section: Case Histories Of Breaching Flow Slidesmentioning
confidence: 99%