2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1352-2310(01)00528-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field observations of regional and urban impacts on NO2, ozone, UVB, and nitrate radical production rates in the Phoenix air basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in contrast to previous measurements obtained at Usery Pass, at a site on the eastern (downwind) side of the city of Phoenix, in MayJune 1998; here, O 3 levels were as high as 95 ppb and exceeded 80 ppb on a number of days. 25 O 3 values are seen to reach maximum values during the early afternoon at both sites consistent with local photochemical sources. Nighttime O 3 values are when min values are found and are consistent with O 3 loss because of titration by NO to form NO 2 being the predominant loss mechanism followed by O 3 dry deposition to the surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This is in contrast to previous measurements obtained at Usery Pass, at a site on the eastern (downwind) side of the city of Phoenix, in MayJune 1998; here, O 3 levels were as high as 95 ppb and exceeded 80 ppb on a number of days. 25 O 3 values are seen to reach maximum values during the early afternoon at both sites consistent with local photochemical sources. Nighttime O 3 values are when min values are found and are consistent with O 3 loss because of titration by NO to form NO 2 being the predominant loss mechanism followed by O 3 dry deposition to the surface.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…10 for days without rain events. Both sites show reduced UVB radiation when compared to the clear sky modeled values, as expected for sites with significant UVB absorbing gases and aerosols (Castro et al, 2001;Gaffney et al, 2002;Barnard et al, 2008). However, the UVB radiation field observed at site T1 is reduced further than that observed at site T0.…”
Section: MMsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…10 for days without rain events. Both sites show reduced UVB radiation when compared to the clear sky modeled values, as expected for sites with significant UVB absorbing gases and aerosols Gaffney et al, 2002;. However, the UVB radiation field observed at site Tl is reduced further than that observed at site TO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%