1998
DOI: 10.1007/s001220050782
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field performance of cell-suspension-derived Lolium perenne L. regenerants and their progenies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Transgenic crops are now well established, occupying some 53 million ha outside Europe (James 2001). Methods of regenerating green plants from cell suspensions have been developed for perennial ryegrass, Italian ryegrass, tall fescue and cocksfoot (Dalton 1988;Horn et al 1988;Stadelmann et al 1998). Biolistics has been the most successful means of transforming grasses.…”
Section: Genetic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transgenic crops are now well established, occupying some 53 million ha outside Europe (James 2001). Methods of regenerating green plants from cell suspensions have been developed for perennial ryegrass, Italian ryegrass, tall fescue and cocksfoot (Dalton 1988;Horn et al 1988;Stadelmann et al 1998). Biolistics has been the most successful means of transforming grasses.…”
Section: Genetic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to assess the suitability of biotechnological approaches in grass improvement programs, the agronomic performance of transgenic plants and their progenies must first be investigated. Moreover, such experiments must be carried out in the field to test the plants under conditions relevant to plant breeding (Stadelmann et al 1998b). To date, there are no reports on agronomic evaluations of transgenic forage grass plants under field conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with non-transformed control plants transgenecontaining plants showed, on average, a delay in heading (37.3 days vs. 29.9 days after the first LD) (Table 1, Expt A). It is known that in Lolium and other monocot species, tissue culture and particle bombardment can cause late heading because of chromosomal changes (Stadelmann et al 1998, Choi et al 2000a. Indeed, late heading was also observed in some of the transformants lacking the transgene (Table 1, Expt A) or lacking transgene expression (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%