2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field persistence of Habrobracon hebetor (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) following augmentative releases against the millet head miner, Heliocheilus albipunctella (de Joannis) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the Sahel

Abstract: h i g h l i g h t s H. hebetor parasitism of MHM remains high one year after release. Releases of H. hebetor in two successive years slightly reduced MHM damage. H. hebetor host feeding contributed additional MHM mortality. Augmentative releases of H. hebetor every two years may be sufficient.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
31
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of this parasitoid against the MHM was first demonstrated in the late 1980s in Senegal (Bhatnagar, 1987(Bhatnagar, , 1989, and subsequently in Niger in the early 2000s (Garba & Gaoh, 2008). In recent years, its effectiveness for augmentative biological control has been demonstrated in the Sahel (Ba et al, 2014(Ba et al, , 2013Kabore, Ba, Dabire-Binso, & Sanon, 2017;Payne et al, 2011), with an estimated yield gain of 34% (Baoua et al, 2014). The parasitoids are released from 15 cm × 25 cm small jute bags containing a mixture of millet grains and flour together with 25 larvae of the rice meal moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and two mated H. hebetor females (Ba et al, 2014(Ba et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of this parasitoid against the MHM was first demonstrated in the late 1980s in Senegal (Bhatnagar, 1987(Bhatnagar, , 1989, and subsequently in Niger in the early 2000s (Garba & Gaoh, 2008). In recent years, its effectiveness for augmentative biological control has been demonstrated in the Sahel (Ba et al, 2014(Ba et al, , 2013Kabore, Ba, Dabire-Binso, & Sanon, 2017;Payne et al, 2011), with an estimated yield gain of 34% (Baoua et al, 2014). The parasitoids are released from 15 cm × 25 cm small jute bags containing a mixture of millet grains and flour together with 25 larvae of the rice meal moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), and two mated H. hebetor females (Ba et al, 2014(Ba et al, , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though H. hebetor mass cultured on C. cephalonica has been successfully used for augmentative releases against the MHM in the Sahel (Kabore et al 2017;Baoua et al 2018), the field fitness of the parasitoid derived from the new proposed rearing method need to be further investigated. As indicated in other settings, rearing conditions can affect field performance of released parasitoids (Collier and Steenwyk 2004;Gandolfi et al 2003;Bloem et al 2004;Joyce et al 2010;Sepúlveda et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Augmentative releases of H. hebetor led to a maximum of 80% parasitism of MHM larvae (Payne et al 2011;Ba et al 2013), resulting in yield increases of at least 30% . Although releasing H. hebetor controls MHM, further MHM outbreaks can occur in subsequent years because there are few alternate hosts for the parasitoid to survive on during the off-season (Kabore et al 2017). Consequently, new populations of parasitoids must be released each growing season.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the nature of the crop (annual), the nature of the pest (one generation per year), the short period of time when the target pest is present (pearl millet reproduction stage), and the low possibilities for released parasitoids to survive the long dry season (Kabore et al 2017), there is no reason to release more parasitoids than what is really needed. Apart from the economic implication, the release of excessive numbers of parasitoids per unit of area could lead to the reduction in their efficiency (Knipling 1977).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%