2019
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2019)038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field redefinitions in effective theories at higher orders

Abstract: 2 More generally, any change of renormalization scheme can compensated by a change in the action. 3 Actually, the renormalization group invariance can be understood as the invariance under a particular type of field redefinition [3]. 4 In fact, this is more than a mere analogy: any quantum field theory has a BRST symmetry associated

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
(176 reference statements)
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field redefinition for n + A c is fixed only up to residual gauge transformation and the above relations hold only for a specific, non-covariant gauge choice. In practice, we want to use a covariant gauge fixing in the original fields to ensure that the SCET LSZ Zfactor of the collinear fields as well as the MS field renormalization factor does not receive any O(λ) contribution at one-loop, 8 such that the LSZ Z-factor remains the same with the above field redefinition. This choice allows to directly compare the on-shell Green functions computed with the original fields to those computed with the redefined fields.…”
Section: Extension Of Soft Mixing To the Non-abelian Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The field redefinition for n + A c is fixed only up to residual gauge transformation and the above relations hold only for a specific, non-covariant gauge choice. In practice, we want to use a covariant gauge fixing in the original fields to ensure that the SCET LSZ Zfactor of the collinear fields as well as the MS field renormalization factor does not receive any O(λ) contribution at one-loop, 8 such that the LSZ Z-factor remains the same with the above field redefinition. This choice allows to directly compare the on-shell Green functions computed with the original fields to those computed with the redefined fields.…”
Section: Extension Of Soft Mixing To the Non-abelian Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a well-known result due to Kluberg-Stern and Zuber [3] states that eom operators (also termed "class II") do not mix into physical ("class I") operators under renormalization (see also [1,4] and [5][6][7][8] for other aspects of the statement), which implies a triangular structure of the operator anomalous dimension matrix (ADM). This does not mean that eom operators can always be ignored in ADM computations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision of using the equations of motion is left to the user, as it may be convenient to work with redundant bases in some cases (see ref. [5]). It is also possible not only to compute invariants but to generate all covariant operators, classified by their irreps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that some operators with derivatives can be rewritten in terms of others. Moreover, at each order in the effective Lagrangian, the addition of an operator proportional to the equations of motion does not change the S matrix up to higher order effects [1][2][3][4][5]. It follows that the equations of motion can be used, for example, to obtain a basis in which all the operators proportional to the functional derivative of the kinetic term have been removed [6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a system which initially appears to generate just such problems is reduction of type IIA supergravity on a non-compact H (2,2) A recent list of some of the literature on field redefinitions in effective theories may be found in [2]. 2 The various problems involving technically inconsistent dimensional reduction are a large topic. Older literature on problems of consistent and technically inconsistent Kaluza-Klein reductions can be found in Refs [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%