2016
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-084918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Research on Law in Conflict Zones and Authoritarian States

Abstract: Scholars of law and social science have challenged conventional wisdom that law and courts in authoritarian states are, at best, the tools of dictators and that law fails to matter in places riven by violence or warfare. Less discussed is how this expansive body of research is being carried out in conflict zones and authoritarian states. This article takes on that challenge: to describe the state of the study of field research on law by paying close attention to those unlikely places—conflict-affected and auth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of judges in military regimes presents specific methodological and ethical challenges. Scholars have affirmed the need for fieldwork, archival research, and ethnographic observations in authoritarian regimes, while acknowledging the importance of addressing the ethical and methodological challenges (Massoud 2016). Methodologically, I take a relational approach to studying judges 8 .…”
Section: On Methods: Studying Judges In Military Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study of judges in military regimes presents specific methodological and ethical challenges. Scholars have affirmed the need for fieldwork, archival research, and ethnographic observations in authoritarian regimes, while acknowledging the importance of addressing the ethical and methodological challenges (Massoud 2016). Methodologically, I take a relational approach to studying judges 8 .…”
Section: On Methods: Studying Judges In Military Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These discussions relate to a slowly emerging body of scholarship on conducting fieldwork in dangerous areas. See Massoud (2016).…”
Section: Semi-structured Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the rich body of scholarship that has arisen since Area 's special issue on research in ‘closed contexts’ published 10 years ago (Koch, 2013a), researchers have challenged the moralising assumptions of Western liberal perspectives in field methods in diverse ‘authoritarian’ settings (e.g., Ballvé, 2020; Ghosh, 2018; Glasius et al, 2018; Goode & Ahram, 2016; Hopman, 2021; Janenova, 2019; Koch, 2022; Massoud, 2016; Ryan & Tynen, 2020; Wolf, 2021; Wolfe, 2023). This work moves beyond essentialising binaries of space and subjects as authoritarian/democratic or illiberal/liberal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%