2021
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.14121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field study on flow structures within aquatic vegetation under combined currents and small‐scale waves

Abstract: Field measurements were conducted to study the influence of aquatic vegetation on flow structures in floodplains under combined currents and wind-driven waves.Wave and turbulent velocities were decomposed from the time series of instantaneous velocity and analysed separately. In the present study, the wind waves were small, leading to the ratios of wave excursion (E w ) to stem spacing (S) for all cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flume studies are by definition unable to capture all the spatial scales that may be relevant for hydrodynamic processes in natural systems (Bouma et al, 2007). Field and large‐scale studies involving patches of real‐scale riparian vegetation remain scarce (Berends et al, 2020; Ji et al, 2016; Västilä et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2021). Simulating vegetation with simplified rigid surrogates in physical and numerical models disregards the seasonality and flexibility‐induced flow modifications that may be relevant for understanding and modelling hydromorphological and ecological processes in natural systems (Caroppi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flume studies are by definition unable to capture all the spatial scales that may be relevant for hydrodynamic processes in natural systems (Bouma et al, 2007). Field and large‐scale studies involving patches of real‐scale riparian vegetation remain scarce (Berends et al, 2020; Ji et al, 2016; Västilä et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2021). Simulating vegetation with simplified rigid surrogates in physical and numerical models disregards the seasonality and flexibility‐induced flow modifications that may be relevant for understanding and modelling hydromorphological and ecological processes in natural systems (Caroppi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, researchers studied the impact of suspended sediment and sedimentation on turbulence and flow in mixing boxes (Huang et al., 2022), and analyzed the impacts of tidal flats geomorphology on tidal asymmetry and velocity skew in the Skagit Bay (Nidzieko & Ralston, 2012). Some other concerns, such as effects of vegetation (Schaefer and Nepf, 2022a, 2022b; Y. Zhang et al., 2021), artificial structures (Wu, 2010; W. Zhao, 2009; Zhou, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paul and Gillis (2015) subjected a transplanted meadow of Zostera noltei to both pure current and combined wave-current conditions and observed no differences in timeaveraged velocity, but observed a reduction in TKE in combined wave-current conditions relative to corresponding pure current conditions, which is opposite to the trend observed for rigid models (e.g., Lou et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2020). In a field study on a floodplain of the Yangtze River and for multiple species of flexible vegetation, Zhang et al (2021) observed little impact of waves on the magnitude of TKE associated with the current, but observed that the presence of waves increased the shear layer penetration depth, δ e , relative to that predicted for pure current (Nepf et al, 2007), and they attributed this to the waving of the flexible leaves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%