2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2010.5447024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field test implementation to evaluate a flash LIDAR as a primary sensor for safe lunar landing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the entire lidar trajectory for the flight was reconstructed using IMU, GPS and camera measurements. This process [7] placed the lidar hazards within 1m horizontally of the truth hazards. Furthermore, the lidar had a time-varying range bias which, combined with the above mentioned horizontal trajectory errors, caused the lidar data to be misaligned horizontally and vertically relative to the truth DEM.…”
Section: Test Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the entire lidar trajectory for the flight was reconstructed using IMU, GPS and camera measurements. This process [7] placed the lidar hazards within 1m horizontally of the truth hazards. Furthermore, the lidar had a time-varying range bias which, combined with the above mentioned horizontal trajectory errors, caused the lidar data to be misaligned horizontally and vertically relative to the truth DEM.…”
Section: Test Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The orientation sensor was not actually used while the analog camera was for real-time feedback on gimbal pointing. A comprehensive description of the FT1 hardware, ground infrastructure and trajectory reconstruction is given in [7]. The testing was conducted at NASA Dryden Flight Research Center (DFRC) and Death Valley National Park.…”
Section: Test Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the ALHA T program conducted several studies with numerous field campaigns to determine what the ideal sensors, algorithms, and processing capabilities should be for a terrain sensing/hazard detection system (HDS) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-8 The current-generation sensor suite includes of a flash Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) 9 based Hazard Detection System (HDS), 10 a Navigation Doppler Lidar (NDL), 11 and a long-range Laser Altimeter (LAlt). 12 These sensors and algorithms have been tested in dedicated labs, on specialized gantries, and within helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft to evaluate performance, determine necessary revisions, and step toward next-generation implementations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%