2012
DOI: 10.1021/es203511k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Testing of Arsenic in Groundwater Samples of Bangladesh Using a Test Kit Based on Lyophilized Bioreporter Bacteria

Abstract: A test kit based on living, lyophilized bacterial bioreporters emitting bioluminescence as a response to arsenite and arsenate was applied during a field campaign in six villages across Bangladesh. Bioreporter field measurements of arsenic in groundwater from tube wells were in satisfying agreement with the results of spectroscopic analyses of the same samples conducted in the lab. The practicability of the bioreporter test in terms of logistics and material requirements, suitability for high sample throughput… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
59
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the complete biosensing assay can be performed inside a single disposable microchip containing 16 independent electrochemical cells for the in situ monitoring of β-Gal activity produced by an Escherichia coli arsenic sensitive bioreporter within 25 min-50 min for 7.5 ppb As (III), in comparison to other arsenic sensitive bacterial bioreporters and with a high sensitivity (LOD¼0.8 ppb) (vide infra). Multiple sample analysis in series can further reduce the effective time for a single analysis to 10 min or less (Siegfried et al 2012). Moreover, we validated the present methodology by comparing the bioreporter assay response with atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) on arsenic contaminated groundwater samples from Swiss mountain areas and from Romania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As a result, the complete biosensing assay can be performed inside a single disposable microchip containing 16 independent electrochemical cells for the in situ monitoring of β-Gal activity produced by an Escherichia coli arsenic sensitive bioreporter within 25 min-50 min for 7.5 ppb As (III), in comparison to other arsenic sensitive bacterial bioreporters and with a high sensitivity (LOD¼0.8 ppb) (vide infra). Multiple sample analysis in series can further reduce the effective time for a single analysis to 10 min or less (Siegfried et al 2012). Moreover, we validated the present methodology by comparing the bioreporter assay response with atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) on arsenic contaminated groundwater samples from Swiss mountain areas and from Romania.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Construction of bioreporter bacteria typically starts with identifying a sensory protein that controls expression of a target gene promoter in dependence on one or more chemical inducers12345678. As an example, the ArsR protein represses its cognate promoter P ars , but when cells are exposed to arsenite (AsIII), this oxyanion will interact with ArsR causing it to lose affinity for the operator site close to P ars , thus increasing the rate of transcription from P ars 6.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a historical perspective, most synthetic circuits constructed in bacteria have been implemented using components from the model organism E. coli (Church et al, 2014). This has indeed been the case for biosensors designed to detect arsenic in environmental samples with several designs having been constructed by shuffling the ars components of E. coli (Siegfried et al, 2012, 2015; Wang et al, 2015; Merulla and van der Meer, 2016). Since the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended acceptable limit for drinking water of 10 μg/L arsenic, any modification of natural arsenic sensing systems for biosensing purposes should aim increasing responsivity of the systems to concentrations close to this limit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this sense, developed biosensors proved to be useful tools for arsenite and arsenate detection in groundwater (Siegfried et al, 2012) and river water (Siegfried et al, 2015) as a low cost, suitable and transportable alternative to detect the metalloid to prevent or diminish arsenic exposure. Furthermore, the advent of biological circuit design approaches in the field of synthetic biology has allowed the re-wiring of basic molecular components (regulators, DNA binding sites, and operators), which can be reinserted into the host cell to give rise to sensors with enhanced performance (Stocker et al, 2003; Trang et al, 2005; Fernandez et al, 2016; Merulla and van der Meer, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%