2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Testing of Wind Turbine Towers with Contact and Noncontact Vibration Measurement Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the limitations of the single physical quantity displacement reconstruction method, researchers have further proposed a displacement reconstruction method based on multi-source data [24][25][26][27]. Wang et al [28] accurately reconstructed the vibration response of two 65 m wind turbine towers using Kalman filtering techniques to process the displacement and velocity responses. Park et al [29] successfully estimated the dynamic deflection of the Sorok bridge by integrating strain and acceleration information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the limitations of the single physical quantity displacement reconstruction method, researchers have further proposed a displacement reconstruction method based on multi-source data [24][25][26][27]. Wang et al [28] accurately reconstructed the vibration response of two 65 m wind turbine towers using Kalman filtering techniques to process the displacement and velocity responses. Park et al [29] successfully estimated the dynamic deflection of the Sorok bridge by integrating strain and acceleration information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To summarize, contact health monitoring sensors or non-contact sensors are primarily used in the existing literature about SHM theories and methods to identify static or dynamic characteristic parameters of structures; and, in combination with finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental analysis, structural damage identification and working status estimation are performed based on measured responses of the structure, so as to reveal whole-process static/dynamic behavior, mechanisms and evolutionary rules of the structure under actions of complex loads and environmental coupling. Thanks to definite physical meanings, these approaches have been employed in practical projects [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. However, they remain very vulnerable to limitations of corresponding technical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding structural geometric deformation monitoring, it is both a key component of health monitoring in the field of bridge engineering [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and a critical index of structural behavior evaluation for bridges. To a certain extent, anomalous changes in structural geometry give embodiments to present safety status of bridges in a real sense; and, different degrees of structural damages or defects in long-term service time are also embodied in such anomalous changes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%