2015
DOI: 10.2172/1225496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field Testing Unvented Roofs with Asphalt Shingles in Cold and Hot-Humid Climates

Abstract: The work presented in this report does not represent performance of any product relative to regulated minimum efficiency requirements. The laboratory and/or field sites used for this work are not certified rating test facilities. The conditions and methods under which products were characterized for this work differ from standard rating conditions, as described. Because the methods and conditions differ, the reported results are not comparable to rated product performance and should only be used to estimate pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 17 Images showing results of deconstructive assessments of sealed and insulated attic assemblies in a test roof in a cold climate after one year of stress testing (high indoor moisture gains at 50% RH, intended to lead to failure). Source: Ueno & Lstiburek, 2015 Figure 25 Projected energy savings (heating, cooling and combined time-dependent valuation (TDV)) for ducts in conditioned space across California climate zones compared with the 2013 prescriptive code path to compliance with Title 24 Building Energy Code. Projected savings vary substantially by climate zone and conditioning type.…”
Section: Moisture Performance Of Sealed and Insulated Atticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 17 Images showing results of deconstructive assessments of sealed and insulated attic assemblies in a test roof in a cold climate after one year of stress testing (high indoor moisture gains at 50% RH, intended to lead to failure). Source: Ueno & Lstiburek, 2015 Figure 25 Projected energy savings (heating, cooling and combined time-dependent valuation (TDV)) for ducts in conditioned space across California climate zones compared with the 2013 prescriptive code path to compliance with Title 24 Building Energy Code. Projected savings vary substantially by climate zone and conditioning type.…”
Section: Moisture Performance Of Sealed and Insulated Atticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Hoeschele et al (2015) results represent the only data obtained for modern, new homes built to California's Title 24. All subsequent literature added a total of only 12 additional homes, with homes located in cold (Prahl & Shaffer, 2014), mixed-humid (Boudreaux, Pallin, & Jackson, 2013;Salonvaara, Karagiozis, & Desjarlais, 2013), hot-humid (Ueno & Lstiburek, 2015) and hot-dry climates (Rudd & Lstiburek, 1996;Sherman & Walker, 2002). Nearly all testing in sealed and insulated attic homes comes to the same conclusion: sealed and insulated attics remain somewhat leaky to both outside and the house, and they are likely leakier than the houses they are attached to when normalized by surface area.…”
Section: Measured Airtightness Of Sealed and Insulated Atticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Almost as soon as sealed and insulated attics gained popularity, their potential to lead to moisture and mold problems became evident (Rudd, 2005;Ueno & Lstiburek, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heat and moisture models were provided by Burch and Luna (1980), Ford (1982), Cleary (1984) and Gorman (1987).These references represent the work completed up to 1990. Several attic performance models have appeared since then: Straube et al (2010), Salonvaara et al (2013), Roppel et al (2013) and Ueno and Lstiburek (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%