2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field validation of a new low-cost method for determining occurrence and duration of combined sewer overflows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schroeder et al (2011) used real data to study the relationship between rainfall height and overflow activity, but the data were from only a few CSO structures within a network. More recently, Montserrat et al (2013) developed and validated a low-cost method to measure the occurrence and duration of overflows using temperature sensors, which makes measuring all of the CSO structures within a CSS economically feasible.…”
Section: G R a P H I C A L Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Schroeder et al (2011) used real data to study the relationship between rainfall height and overflow activity, but the data were from only a few CSO structures within a network. More recently, Montserrat et al (2013) developed and validated a low-cost method to measure the occurrence and duration of overflows using temperature sensors, which makes measuring all of the CSO structures within a CSS economically feasible.…”
Section: G R a P H I C A L Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent development of low-cost CSO-monitoring methods (e.g. Montserrat et al, 2013) offers an excellent opportunity for the thorough evaluation of CSSs. The insight gained from such an evaluation can be used to improve their overall performance while reducing the negative impacts of overflows.…”
Section: G R a P H I C A L Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, such expensive equipment may be needed and used just few days per year, when SSO occur. Alternatively, there are surrogate methods that can be used for the monitoring of the SSO events: motion, moisture, temperature and water quality sensors; video image analysis; sampling of human specific contaminants like caffeine in the receiving waters; electrical contacts closing during SSO events; as well as various modelling approaches [9][10][11][12][13]. These methods have drawbacks of potential false detections (motion, moisture, temperature, electrical sensors), moderate to high investment, running and maintenance costs (water quality sensors, video image analysis, caffeine sampling), or the lack of long-term monitoring data and a calibrated model for the modelling approaches [10,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%