Field Validation of the MC Default Fill Hydrogen Fueling Protocol

Mathison, Steven; Handa, Kiyoshi; McGuire, Timothy; Brown, Tyler; Goldstein, Todd; Johnston, Michael

doi:10.4271/2015-01-1177

Cited by 28 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The full implementation of the MC formula method was done into the SAE J2601 2016 standard shortly after the table-based method which was standardised in SAE J2601 2014. All-though, both the MC formula method and table-based protocol are tested by computer simulations and field testing [10,23,19,20] before being accepted into SAE J2601 2016, the scientific studies comparing the two methods are limited. A description of the two methods will be given in this section, focusing on the MC formula, which is the main focus of this study.…”

Section: Hydrogen Fueling Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The fueling methods have also been studied, albeit in a lesser amount of publications, with Maus et al studying the effects of different parameters that led to the protocol development in 2010 [18] and Schneider et al in 2010 talking about the table-based method implementation, and in 2014, its validation [19,20]. The MC formula fueling method has not been thoroughly studied since its proposal in 2010 by Harty et al (funded by Honda) [21], its implementation in the J2601 protocol in 2012 [22] and its field validation study later in 2015 by the same group of people, Mathison et al [23].…”

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Overall efficiency comparison between the fueling methods of SAEJ2601 using dynamic simulations

Chochlidakis

Rothuizen

2020

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Hydrogen Fueling Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Overall efficiency comparison between the fueling methods of SAEJ2601 using dynamic simulations

Chochlidakis

Rothuizen

2020

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…The heat capacity will be the deciding factor for the storage density of compressed H 2 tank. Therefore, heat capacity is defined in terms of initial temperature, pressure, and volume of station and vehicle tank …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, heat capacity is defined in terms of initial temperature, pressure, and volume of station and vehicle tank. 43 Based on station and vehicle parameter as tabulated in Table 3 total heat transfer, internal energy, amount of H 2 transported from station to vehicle tank were determined.…”

Section: Heat Capacity Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of compressed hydrogen refueling process of 60 L type IV tank used in fuel cell vehicles

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hydrogen fuel cell vehicle provides the significant advantage of high energy conversion efficiency and zero emission. Efficient hydrogen storage methods are vital for successful implementation of the hydrogen‐related technologies. Compressed hydrogen storage has been considered as a promising option in recently commercialized hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. The short filling time and high state of charge of compressed hydrogen storage tank are an essential requirement for fuel cell vehicles. This study presents the detail investigation of refueling compressed storage tank using computational fluid dynamics simulation and heat capacity model. The goal of the simulation is to identify the end temperature and state of charge. Initially, the mathematical model of end temperature and state charge is formulated. Later, the overall heat transfer involved in the refueling process is investigated by heat capacity model based on MC method defined by SAE J2601. The density obtains from the simulation is compared with the National Institute of Standards and Technology database. The SE in simulated results for the state of charge is reduced to <1% after applying the heat capacity method. The results may shade light on better understanding the refueling process of compressed hydrogen storage for fuel cell vehicle.

show abstract

“…Severe pressure and temperature changes affect the mechanical properties of the resin matrix and reduce the fatigue life and the state of charge (SOC) of the gas cylinder [2,3]. When the temperature of hydrogen in a high-pressure hydrogen storage cylinder exceeds 85 • C or falls below −40 • C, the cylinder is at risk of damage [4,5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Rapid Filling of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Cylinder

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The fast charging process of high-pressure gas storage cylinders is accompanied by high temperature rise, which potentially induces the failure of solid materials inside the cylinders and the underfilling of the cylinders. A two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric model simulated the charging process of hydrogen storage cylinders with a rated working pressure of 35 MPa and a volume of 150 L. During filling, the highest temperature rise inside the cylinder occurs at the bottom part of the cylinder, and the state of charge (SOC) is 46.4% after filling. This temperature rise can be reduced by precooling the injected hydrogen, and the highest SOC can reach 95.7% after injection. The SOC in the cylinder gradually increases with a decrease in the temperature of the hydrogen injection. The maximum SOC increase is 49.3%. For safety and the SOC exceeding 90%, the hydrogen gas should be precooled to below −10 °C, and the SOC could achieve more than 90.3%. The internal structure of the hydrogen cylinder was further optimized without a precooling condition. The selected length ratios were 25%, 50%, and 75%. Compared with the initial scheme, the SOC in the optimization scheme increased by 16%, 38.7%, and 40.1%.

show abstract

Field Validation of the MC Default Fill Hydrogen Fueling Protocol

Cited by 28 publications

References 2 publications

Overall efficiency comparison between the fueling methods of SAEJ2601 using dynamic simulations

Overall efficiency comparison between the fueling methods of SAEJ2601 using dynamic simulations

Investigation of compressed hydrogen refueling process of 60 L type IV tank used in fuel cell vehicles

Numerical Simulation and Optimization of Rapid Filling of High-Pressure Hydrogen Storage Cylinder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About