1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002710050034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field values of the shape factor for estimating surface storage in furrows on a clay soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those studies have shown that, while (f y is relatively constant under some conditions, it can vary substantially (within the theoretical range 0.5 < ITy < 1.0) depending on the slope, channel geometry, hydraulic roughness, and infiltration properties of the field. On the other hand, field studies have measured (f v values outside the theoretical range (Esfandiari and Maheshwari 1997). Those results were attributed to large changes in furrow geometry and hydraulic roughness during the course of the observed irrigation event.…”
Section: Nonuniformity Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those studies have shown that, while (f y is relatively constant under some conditions, it can vary substantially (within the theoretical range 0.5 < ITy < 1.0) depending on the slope, channel geometry, hydraulic roughness, and infiltration properties of the field. On the other hand, field studies have measured (f v values outside the theoretical range (Esfandiari and Maheshwari 1997). Those results were attributed to large changes in furrow geometry and hydraulic roughness during the course of the observed irrigation event.…”
Section: Nonuniformity Of the Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies (Esfandiari and Maheshwari 1997) have shown that large field undulations relative to the average slope cause substantial variation in the depth profile. Such conditions may complicate or altogether invalidate the application.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(2) may seem reasonable, such as with sloping open-ended furrow irrigation systems, Vy estimates can be suspect and lead to inaccurate infiltration function determinations (Walker and Kasilingam 2004). Inaccurate determinations arise first, because of the uncertainty in the determination of the Manning roughness coefficient n, and second because Uy is time dependent and not necessarily less than unity, as suggested by field studies (Esfandiari and Maheshwari 1997b). The analysis conducted examines the characteristics of optimal and PIVB infiltration parameter estimates derived from four basin irrigation data sets, and the implications of using alternative infiltration solutions for assessing the performance of the observed irrigation event.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%