2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00153-019-00683-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fields with a dense-codense linearly independent multiplicative subgroup

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…) is an H -structure. We call such a pair (R, P(R)) a G-structure [4]. Similarly, we can obtain a G-structure expansion of an algebraically closed field K by taking a multiplicative group generated by the set H (K ) in an H -structure (K , H (K )).…”
Section: Properties Of Definable Sets and Types In Dense/codense Expansionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…) is an H -structure. We call such a pair (R, P(R)) a G-structure [4]. Similarly, we can obtain a G-structure expansion of an algebraically closed field K by taking a multiplicative group generated by the set H (K ) in an H -structure (K , H (K )).…”
Section: Properties Of Definable Sets and Types In Dense/codense Expansionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that such expansions are not necessarily dense/co-dense. It is shown in [4] that G-structures satisfy the Mann property.…”
Section: Properties Of Definable Sets and Types In Dense/codense Expansionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, Mann's result was generalized in [5]. For the model-theoretic approaches, the reader might consult [1,4,8]. In [9], the second author and Sertbaş proved that a number field K is either Q or an imaginary quadratic fied if and only if Equation (1.1) has only finitely many non-degenerate solutions with coordinates in O K for all a 1 , ..., a k ∈ O K .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G be the disjoint union of K \(P +πP ) and P 2 , equipped with the group structure induced from K via the identity map on the first part and via f on the second. Then G is not strongly large, since dim G = 1 and dim cl(G) = 2, but it is definably isomorphic to the L-definable group K. Theorem 1.1 puts a constraint on the existence of new definable groups, which has already been the theme of previous research, such as in [4] and [5]. Let N = M, P denote one of the aforementioned pairs from [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%