2018
DOI: 10.3126/dsaj.v12i0.22177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fieldwork among Women in Nepal: A Female Researcher Revisits Her Experience

Abstract: In this paper, I argue, based on in-depth interviews with 75 rural women from 25 households in Nepal nearly eight years ago, that a reflection on fieldwork helps a researcher to critically review and critically appreciate one’s own work and to identify challenges that can be helpful not only to the researcher but also other researchers. I describe three distinct stages of my fieldwork. The first one relates to the image I held regarding rural women’s life and society as well as the information generation techn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many researchers have emphasised that when we work with individuals and communities, we must be aware of the contradictions of conducting fieldwork that centres equity and social justice in contexts where structural power imbalances exist between the researcher and those individuals and communities being researched (Subedi, 2006;Ozkazanc-Pan, 2012;Manning, 2018;Wolf, 2018). Throughout this study, we were reflexive about our positionalities, how our "Otherness" contributes towards power relations (Subedi, 2006;Mishra, 2018), and how we could minimise these effects in our research. Further discussion of positionality is presented in Sect.…”
Section: Multi-hazard Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have emphasised that when we work with individuals and communities, we must be aware of the contradictions of conducting fieldwork that centres equity and social justice in contexts where structural power imbalances exist between the researcher and those individuals and communities being researched (Subedi, 2006;Ozkazanc-Pan, 2012;Manning, 2018;Wolf, 2018). Throughout this study, we were reflexive about our positionalities, how our "Otherness" contributes towards power relations (Subedi, 2006;Mishra, 2018), and how we could minimise these effects in our research. Further discussion of positionality is presented in Sect.…”
Section: Multi-hazard Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Markham (2013) states that "fieldwork is often used as a method of engaging with the phenomenon to gather information/data or to analyze practices in situ" (p. 435). Arguably, making data in qualitative fieldwork is influenced by several factors such as local culture, researcher identity, hierarchy, power relations, and gender matching between the researcher and the participants (Mishra, 2018;Punch, 2012;Subedi, 2023;Subedi & Gaulee, 2023). Likewise, the researcher enters the field with feelings, aspirations, and assumptions concerning their embodiment in the fieldwork.…”
Section: Understanding and Approaching The Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the role of gender in qualitative fieldwork is much discussed in the Western setting, it is minimally addressed in the non-Western context. Considering the literature in Nepal is rare in the role of gender matching during fieldwork, a few studies (Mishra, 2018;Subedi, 2023;Subedi & Gaulee, 2023) discussed the role of complex gender dynamics during the in-depth interview. While interviewing the female teacher, I realized that the extra layer of gendered complexity was negatively influenced.…”
Section: Matching the Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations