2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-015-0471-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fifty years of genetic studies: what to make of the large amounts of variation found within populations?

Abstract: International audienceNo abstract availabl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In forest trees, high genetic diversity is better maintained within populations than among them (Hamrick 2004;Scotti et al 2016), and results from the current study M. dasyclada are in concordance with this notion. This characteristic could be due to having effective pollen dispersal, which facilities gene flow (Kremer et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In forest trees, high genetic diversity is better maintained within populations than among them (Hamrick 2004;Scotti et al 2016), and results from the current study M. dasyclada are in concordance with this notion. This characteristic could be due to having effective pollen dispersal, which facilities gene flow (Kremer et al 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Evolution by natural selection relies on the presence of standing variation but acts to diminish it. This conundrum drives the need to understand what forces maintain standing variation in nature (Mitchell‐Olds et al ., ) and has produced many studies investigating the circumstances under which heterozygosity at a locus is preserved through evolutionary time (Hedrick, , ; Delph & Kelly, ; Scotti et al ., ). Despite criticism stemming from previous theoretical models, our model demonstrates that variation in resource allocation can result in fitness trade‐offs in life‐history traits, and those trade‐offs can protect polymorphism, maintaining natural variation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, increased potential for microevolution in trees contrasts with slow macroevolutionary rates (6). The current most-favored explanation for this paradox is that selection is not a major driver of genetic diversity (41). In nonsessile organisms, selection has been shown to contribute very little to phenotypic changes over time and changing climate (42).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%