Fighter Aircraft Design System User's Manual

Schwartz, Joshua A.

doi:10.21236/ada200453

Cited by 3 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are two predominant value surveys appearing regularly in the academic literature: the RVS, developed by Milton Rokeach (1973), and the Schwartz Value Survey, developed by Shalom Schwartz (2009). We elected to use the RVS given the reportedly strong theoretical foundation of the instrument focusing on personal values underlying the survey (Rokeach & Ball‐Rokeach, 1989).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the value orientation preferences and the importance given to principled moral reasoning of Generation Zs: A cross‐generational comparison

Weber

2024

Business and Society Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Within the past few years, a new generation has joined the ranks of business managers or is preparing to become business managers: Generation Z (Gen Z), described as individuals born between 1995 and 2010. This paper has two aims: (1) to assess the Gen Z cohort framed by their value orientation preferences (VOP) and the importance given to principled moral reasoning (PMR) using values and cognitive moral reasoning theories and (2) to compare this information about the Gen Z cohort to prior generations. Using the Rokeach Value Survey and the Moral Reasoning Inventory, we uncovered support for our expectations that Gen Zs would have a balanced set of VOP—that is, similar preferences for a personal and a social value orientation and similar preferences for a competence and moral value orientation. Further, Gen Z preferences are unlike prior generations. The importance given to principled moral reasoning to resolve ethical dilemmas is lower than Baby Boomers and Gen Xers but surprisingly higher than Millennials as found in prior studies. Implications of these discoveries and suggestions for future research are presented.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the value orientation preferences and the importance given to principled moral reasoning of Generation Zs: A cross‐generational comparison

Weber

2024

Business and Society Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We measured conformity values with the Schwartz Value Survey (SVS; Schwartz, 2009b) as part of the T1 survey. Subjects completed the entire Schwartz Value Survey, which captures 57 items corresponding to the 10 value types in the Schwartz values circumplex (Schwartz, 2012).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participants rated the importance of each item as a guiding principle in their life using a 9‐point Likert scale ranging from 1 ( opposed to my values ) to 9 ( of supreme importance ). We created a mean rating score across all items and subtracted this value from each individual item rating to create centered item scores according to the process outlined by Schwartz (2009b). We then averaged the four centered conformity items (politeness, obedience, honoring parents and elders, and self‐discipline; raw item α = .72) to create an overall conformity score.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because the Schwartz (2012) circumplex suggests that values are best considered in context with each other, we also controlled for one value type from each of the other quadrants (i.e., benevolence, power, and stimulation; α = .83, .79, and .82, respectively). This is an accepted and parsimonious approach to utilizing the Schwartz values scale (e.g., Arthaud‐Day et al, 2012; Chui et al, 2002; Schwartz, 2009b). Results were consistent in pattern and significance whether conformity was included as a sole predictor or along with these other values.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Relative income and value congruence in dual‐income couples

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryGuided by social role theory, social science research has established an individual's earnings relative to their partner (i.e., their relative income) as an important indicator of various marital‐ and well‐being‐related outcomes. Yet, despite a deep interest in employee compensation systems, management scholars have rarely considered the implications of relative income for workers. To address this oversight, we consider how the conformity values of dual‐income couples jointly predict relative income and how this relationship varies by gender. Further, we examine how relative income predicts employees' subjective career success and explore potential boundary conditions to this relationship. Using a time‐lagged study in a sample of 225 dyads, results from moderated polynomial regression analyses indicate that dyadic congruence in conformity values predicts relative income in a gender‐dependent way. Additionally, moderated multilevel regression analyses illustrate that respondents with lower absolute income display a stronger positive relationship between relative income and subjective career success. Relative income's effects on subjective career success do not depend on gender. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings regarding gender, conformity values, relative income, absolute income, and subjective career success.

show abstract

Mission Performance Considered as Point Performance in Aircraft Design

McDonald

2011

Journal of Aircraft

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fighter Aircraft Design System User's Manual

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Assessing the value orientation preferences and the importance given to principled moral reasoning of Generation Zs: A cross‐generational comparison

Assessing the value orientation preferences and the importance given to principled moral reasoning of Generation Zs: A cross‐generational comparison

Relative income and value congruence in dual‐income couples

Mission Performance Considered as Point Performance in Aircraft Design

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About