Fighting &amp;quot;Big Government&amp;quot;: Frames, Federalism, and Social Policy Reform in the United States

The 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) encouraged states to reduce welfare caseloads. Caseload reduction can be accomplished by promoting exit for work, marriage, or other private means of support and by diverting new applicants. Most research on caseload decline has focused on welfare-to-work outcomes; less is known about processes of diversion. This study employs administrative records and ethnographic data to examine diversion in West County, New York, from 1999 to 2003. Findings demonstrate a high level of diversion and suggest that application is an ongoing and at times remedial process rather than an event. Diversion occurs at all points of the expanded TANF (Temporary Assistance to Needy Families) intake process and is associated with one-time lump sum payments as well as the hassle factor engendered by new eligibility requirements. The encumbered lives of applicants and TANF staff discretion are also implicated as factors contributing to diversion. We conclude with an analysis of the implications of TANF diversion for access to benefits. Copyright 2006 by The Policy Studies Organization.

show abstract

Fighting "Big Government": Frames, Federalism, and Social Policy Reform in the United States

Cited by 5 publications

References 55 publications

Cross-cutting Initiatives

Cross-cutting Initiatives

The Ideational Dimension of Federalism: The ‘Australian Model’ and the Politics of Equalisation in Canada

“It’s Great When People Don’t Even Have Their Welfare Cases Opened”: TANF Diversion as Process and Lesson

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About