2010
DOI: 10.1080/0966369x.2010.517027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fighting for recognition: feminist geography in East-Central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…). Moreover, studies of counterurbanisation in post‐socialist countries are often inaccessible to a wider international audience, due to the linguistic diversity of the region (see Timár and Fekete for further discussion of ‘information impermeability’ in the case of feminist geographies in Central and Eastern Europe). The unique opportunity to test the validity of western counterurbanisation concepts in the unique transitional framework of post‐socialist countries, remains open (Brown and Schafft ; Musil ; Jauhiainen ).…”
Section: The Contribution Of Counterurbanisation and Post‐socialist Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Moreover, studies of counterurbanisation in post‐socialist countries are often inaccessible to a wider international audience, due to the linguistic diversity of the region (see Timár and Fekete for further discussion of ‘information impermeability’ in the case of feminist geographies in Central and Eastern Europe). The unique opportunity to test the validity of western counterurbanisation concepts in the unique transitional framework of post‐socialist countries, remains open (Brown and Schafft ; Musil ; Jauhiainen ).…”
Section: The Contribution Of Counterurbanisation and Post‐socialist Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not to disregard works published by geographers in (not just from) Eastern and Central European countries (and see Timár 2004). However, even review papers produced by geographers from ECE suggest that the 'mainstream geography' (Timár and Fekete 2010) as an academic discipline in ECE is in the first place preoccupied with macro-regional structures, and while geographers' interest in the everydayness is arguably on the increase, children are largely excluded from geographical discourses in these regions (see also Timár 2003aTimár , 2003b). 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These are only a few of many questions which we may employ to understand the influences and potentials of knowledge productions of various scholars in various localities. While some authors have recognized existing hegemonies in terms of the Anglo-American 1 dominance in knowledge production (Blažek and Rochovská, 2006;Brown and Browne, 2016) or the Eurocentrism of contemporary social sciences (Kulpa and Silva, 2016), they have been less tangible in naming the concrete barriers and even less often offered tools or courageous visions by which it would be possible to overcome and/or deconstruct them (Kitchin, 2003(Kitchin, , 2005Kulpa and Silva, 2016;Timár, 2007;Timár and Fekete, 2010;Tlostanova, 2014). Despite these repeated calls, the hegemony of this knowledge production has had and continues to have a substantial impact on the shape of (not-only) European discourses in gender/feminist, 2 sexuality and queer studies.…”
Section: Hegemonic Knowledgesmentioning
confidence: 99%