2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-44000-2_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Figures for what purposes? The issues at stake in the struggles to define and control the uses of statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, particularly in growing fields such as social and environmental reporting (cf., Cho & Patten, 2013), measures characterize both academic work and in applied practice, where they are used for reporting and disclosure purposes. It is common for academics to adopt measures used by practitioners and vice versa, often without taking into account the unique settings in which metrics are designed, by whom and for what purposes (cf., Gilles, 2016). Sociologists of quantification have noted how metrics that were developed for one purpose often shift to different purposes (Desrosières, 1993); internal accounting figures become external benchmarks, feedback metrics become performance targets, and the like.…”
Section: The Metrics Of Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, particularly in growing fields such as social and environmental reporting (cf., Cho & Patten, 2013), measures characterize both academic work and in applied practice, where they are used for reporting and disclosure purposes. It is common for academics to adopt measures used by practitioners and vice versa, often without taking into account the unique settings in which metrics are designed, by whom and for what purposes (cf., Gilles, 2016). Sociologists of quantification have noted how metrics that were developed for one purpose often shift to different purposes (Desrosières, 1993); internal accounting figures become external benchmarks, feedback metrics become performance targets, and the like.…”
Section: The Metrics Of Ethicsmentioning
confidence: 99%