2019
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.191669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filamentous phages reduce bacterial growth in low salinities

Abstract: Being non-lytic, filamentous phages can replicate at high frequencies and often carry virulence factors, which are important in the evolution and emergence of novel pathogens. However, their net effect on bacterial fitness remains unknown. To understand the ecology and evolution between filamentous phages and their hosts, it is important to assess (i) fitness effects of filamentous phages on their hosts and (ii) how these effects depend on the environment. To determine how the net effect on bacterial fitness b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filamentous phages usually reduce bacterial growth, as reported for Xanthomonas citri [34,35], Xanthomonas campestris [36], Ralstonia solanacearum [37], Pseudoalteromonas [38], Vibrio alginolyticus [39], and E. coli [40,41]. However, there are known cases where filamentous phages do not affect the growth of their host as in X. campestris [42], R. solanacearum [43], and Yersinia pestis [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Filamentous phages usually reduce bacterial growth, as reported for Xanthomonas citri [34,35], Xanthomonas campestris [36], Ralstonia solanacearum [37], Pseudoalteromonas [38], Vibrio alginolyticus [39], and E. coli [40,41]. However, there are known cases where filamentous phages do not affect the growth of their host as in X. campestris [42], R. solanacearum [43], and Yersinia pestis [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We quantified resistance to the respective ancestral phage by determining the reduction in bacterial growth rate (RBG) imposed by the phage, adapted from [24] with some modifications according to [25]. Twenty-four random colonies from each population from transfers T0, T1, T2, T6, T12, T18, T24 and T30 were introduced into 96-well microtiter plates containing Medium101 at a concentration of 5 × 10 6 cells ml −1 and inoculated with approximately 2.5 × 10 6 PFU ml -1 of the respective ancestral phage used for the selection experiment or without phage (control).…”
Section: (C) Measuring Phage-defencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We quantified the bacteria could not get infected by the respective ancestral phage by determining the reduction in bacterial growth rate (RBG) imposed by the phage, adapted from (Poullain, Gandon et al 2008) with some modifications according to (Goehlich, Roth et al 2019). Twenty-four random colonies from each population from transfer T0, T1, T2, T6, T12, T18, T24, and T30 were introduced into 96-well microtiter plates containing Medium101 at a concentration of 5×10 6 cells/ml and inoculated with ~2.5×10 6 PFU/ml of the respective ancestral phage used for the selection experiment or without phage (control).…”
Section: (C) Measuring Phage-defencementioning
confidence: 99%