2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120457
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film cooling performance evaluation of the furcate hole with cross-flow coolant injection: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A ramped vortex generator was placed downstream of the cooling hole for terminating the CRVP progression via creating a new vortex pair; thus, the coolant was positioned close to the wall surface and stretched further downstream [5]. Recently, the film cooling performance (FCP) of a novel furcate hole was examined, and it was found that the lateral coverage of the coolant was more comprehensive than that of the traditional cylindrical holes [6]. Generally, all of the aforementioned approaches are passive flow control techniques and are limited, and the dynamic nature of the film cooling flow requires a flow control technique, which could be adjusted in real-time in the course of the flow state, emphasizing the demand for an active film cooling control technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A ramped vortex generator was placed downstream of the cooling hole for terminating the CRVP progression via creating a new vortex pair; thus, the coolant was positioned close to the wall surface and stretched further downstream [5]. Recently, the film cooling performance (FCP) of a novel furcate hole was examined, and it was found that the lateral coverage of the coolant was more comprehensive than that of the traditional cylindrical holes [6]. Generally, all of the aforementioned approaches are passive flow control techniques and are limited, and the dynamic nature of the film cooling flow requires a flow control technique, which could be adjusted in real-time in the course of the flow state, emphasizing the demand for an active film cooling control technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to suppress the generation of CVP and weaken the associated undesirable effects, many kinds of active and passive control [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have been proposed. Among the active control methods, the key parameters mainly include jet flow frequency [8,9], intensity of freestream turbulence [10,11], density ratio [11,12], and blowing ratio [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the active control methods, the key parameters mainly include jet flow frequency [8,9], intensity of freestream turbulence [10,11], density ratio [11,12], and blowing ratio [13]. As for passive control, geometrical shape of film cooling hole [14][15][16] and geometrical parameters of upstream obstacle [17,18] receive lots of attention. The results indicate that the application of a shaped hole or upstream obstacle can suppress the generation of CVP, and hence, weaken the lift-off of coolant jet and its undesirable effect on film cooling performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%