2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2005.08.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film drainage and interfacial instabilities in polymeric systems with diffuse interfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the net cell contact area (the shaded area in Figure 3B) shows a maximum value as capillary number increases. It is noteworthy that dimple formation has been simulated in liquid droplets (Zinchenko and Davis, 2002), and observed in experiments (Horn et al, 2006;Zdravkov et al, 2006). Thus, it may represent a characteristic of deformable particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, the net cell contact area (the shaded area in Figure 3B) shows a maximum value as capillary number increases. It is noteworthy that dimple formation has been simulated in liquid droplets (Zinchenko and Davis, 2002), and observed in experiments (Horn et al, 2006;Zdravkov et al, 2006). Thus, it may represent a characteristic of deformable particles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Here, a so called coalescence bridge between the drops is built (Chen et al, 2004;Radoev et al, 1983;Scheludko et al, 1965;Vrij, 1966). From this 'hole' in the film the coalescence front extends rapidly across the contact area driven by the interfacial tension and coalescence of the two droplets occurs (Aarts et al, 2005;Zdravkov et al, 2006). According to these phases of the coalescence process, the crucial influencing factors are the contact time of the droplets, the drainage time of the film, the critical film thickness and the time of confluence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our results are somewhat scattered, trends are clear. In an attempt to interpret them, two effects are considered that might help their explanation: (1) for partially immiscible blends, coalescence is drastically increased (Zdravkov et al 2006), which leads to large drops after a step-down in shear rate, (2) on the other hand, confinement of flows can cause phenomena like droplet ordering, string formation, etc. (Migler 2001;Pathak et al 2002;Pathak and Migler 2003;Tufano et al 2008a;Vananroye et al 2006).…”
Section: Pb In Pdmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the thread-like structures can also survive for long periods of time, depending on the local degree of confinement (Son et al 2003). As an example, for the 10% PB/PDMS blend, it is known that partial miscibility is present between the phases that enhances the coalescence process dramatically (Zdravkov et al 2006); larger droplets are formed quicker, strengthening the confinement. (see Fig.…”
Section: Pb In Pdmsmentioning
confidence: 99%