2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filter algorithm for influence functions in the computer controlled polishing of high-quality optical lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…61 The quality improvement with respect to the peak valley (PV) value of the surfaces polished with the symmetrically rendered influence function was observed to average 14% greater than the PV value improvement of surfaces that were polished with the raw, unmodified influence function. 61 The PV value indicates the difference between the maximum positive (peak) deviation and the maximum negative (valley) deviation of the actual surface in relation to the ideal surface and is a value that is commonly used to judge the quality of the surface. 15 Experimentation has shown that a significant improvement in the polishing quality is only attainable if a symmetrical influence function of a sufficiently high quality is available.…”
Section: Filter Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…61 The quality improvement with respect to the peak valley (PV) value of the surfaces polished with the symmetrically rendered influence function was observed to average 14% greater than the PV value improvement of surfaces that were polished with the raw, unmodified influence function. 61 The PV value indicates the difference between the maximum positive (peak) deviation and the maximum negative (valley) deviation of the actual surface in relation to the ideal surface and is a value that is commonly used to judge the quality of the surface. 15 Experimentation has shown that a significant improvement in the polishing quality is only attainable if a symmetrical influence function of a sufficiently high quality is available.…”
Section: Filter Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to the Preston hypothesis, the material removal can be calculated as the convolution between the dwell time and removal function, which preferably presents a symmetrical Gaussian shape. Reference [28] indicated that a stable symmetrical removal function not only contributes to planing the polishing path, but also helps to optimize the dwell-time distribution. As shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Theoretical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, an experimental and theoretical investigation of materials removal characteristics and surface generation in bonnet polishing is undertaken which is basically divided into two parts i. volumetric material removal rate [20]. Bonnet polishing involves forcing a spinning, inflated bonnet, covered with the polishing pad, against the polished surfaces flooded with a liquid slurry of abrasive particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%