2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-005-9004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filter-Based Classification of Training Image Patterns for Spatial Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
170
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(182 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
170
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar observations are made in actual field applications where substantial available data show that although the spatial statistics of the TI are reproduced, the data statistics may not be (e.g., Volker and Dimitrakopoulos 2007). Similar remarks are generally valid for the filtersim algorithm (Zhang et al 2006), which uses a limited number of linear filters and may degenerate sample effects.…”
Section: A High Quality Approximationsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar observations are made in actual field applications where substantial available data show that although the spatial statistics of the TI are reproduced, the data statistics may not be (e.g., Volker and Dimitrakopoulos 2007). Similar remarks are generally valid for the filtersim algorithm (Zhang et al 2006), which uses a limited number of linear filters and may degenerate sample effects.…”
Section: A High Quality Approximationsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Today's trends, developments, and applications in this area of problem solving focus on the so-called multiple-point simulation algorithms, such as the snesim (Strebelle 2002), filtersim (Zhang et al 2006;Wu et al 2008), and simpat (Arpat and Caers 2007) algorithms, and related extensions (Boucher 2009;Chugunova and Hu 2008;Mirowski et al 2008;Remy et al 2009;and others). Additional related new developments include Markov random field-based multiple-point type approaches (Daly 2004;Tjelmeland and Eidsvik 2004), kernel approaches (Scheidt and Caers 2009), and multiscale simulations based on discrete wavelet decomposition (Gloaguen and Dimitrakopoulos 2009;Chatterjee et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The northeast faults created a region separated from rest of the study area, indicating compartmentalizing of degasification. In this figure, Q50 realizations of 1998-2006and 2006-2011 show that the E1-E11 panel area continued to deplete in GIP in all coals, at a slower rate. However, there was no change in GIP outside of the northeast faults because boreholes had stopped production after 1998.…”
Section: Spatial Time-lapsed Gas-in-place and Gas-in-place Change Resmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, most of these examples used variogram techniques, which cannot reproduce complex patterns, discontinuities, and curvilinear shapes (Zhang 2008). Multiple-point statistics (mps) proposed by Journel (1992) and extended by Guardiano and Srivastava (1992) by the use of a training image (TI), were made practical with SNESIM (Strebelle 2000) and SIMPAT (Arpat and Caers 2007) and FILTERSIM (Zhang et al 2006) algorithms (Wu et al 2008a). In this work, Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software's (SGeMS) implementation of FILTERSIM was employed to simulate time-lapsed GIP and time-lapsed differences in GIP in the New Castle, Mary Lee/Blue Creek, and Jagger seams.…”
Section: Filter-based Multiple-point Geostatistical Simulation Of Timmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such ineffectiveness is especially severe in geological or environmental studies, as discussed by , Strebelle (2002) and Tjelmeland and Besag (1998). In the past decade, various techniques have been developed to improve the reliability of characterizing random fields, such as bootstrapping (Kleijnen et al, 2012;Schelin and Luna, 2010;Stein, 2008, 2004;Mukul et al, 2004), copula-based methods (Kazianka, 2013;Pilz et al, 2012;Kazianka andPilz, 2010a, 2010b;Bárdossy and Li, 2008;Bárdossy, 2006), kernel-based methods (Honarkhah and Caers, 2010;Scheidt and Caers, 2010, 2009a, 2009b), Bayesian (Nieto-Barajas and Sinha, 2014Troldborg et al, 2012;Pilz et al, 2012;Kazianka andPilz, 2011, 2012), multi-point simulation methods (De Iaco, 2013;Boucher, 2009;Chugunova and Hu, 2008;Wu et al, 2008;Mirowski et al, 2008;Arpat and Caers, 2007;Zhang et al, 2006;Strebelle, 2002), multi-scale simulations using wavelets (Chatterjee and Dimitrakopoulos, 2012;Dimitrakopoulos, 2009, 2008), and spatial-cumulant-based simulation methods (Goodfellow et al, 2012;MachucaMory and Dimitrakopoulos, 2012;, Dimitrakopoulos et al, 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%