2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtered schemes for Hamilton–Jacobi equations: A simple construction of convergent accurate difference schemes

Abstract: Abstract. We build a simple and general class of finite difference schemes for first order Hamilton-Jacobi (HJ) Partial Differential Equations. These filtered schemes are convergent to the unique viscosity solution of the equation. The schemes are accurate: we implement second, third and fourth order accurate schemes in one dimension and second order accurate schemes in two dimensions, indicating how to build higher order ones. They are also explicit, which means they can be solved using the fast sweeping meth… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using analogous reasoning it is straightforward to show that for the other two cases of the square stencil we can obtain (25), (22), respectively. In fact, it is enough to develop the points on Γ along ±η∆ using ∇ ± f , which are always well defined.…”
Section: Proof Of Point (Ii)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Using analogous reasoning it is straightforward to show that for the other two cases of the square stencil we can obtain (25), (22), respectively. In fact, it is enough to develop the points on Γ along ±η∆ using ∇ ± f , which are always well defined.…”
Section: Proof Of Point (Ii)mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…where we chose the value b = 1.05 in order to make the function approach better the value 1 for x = −1, 1. Finally, we recall also the filter defined in [18] as After extensive computations, we noticed that the results obtained with our adaptive filtered (AF) scheme are not sensitive with respect to changes in regularity of the filter function, even with very large transition phases. That is probably because, as we will see in the next section, the parameter ε n is designed to obtain the property (F1) whenever possible, then in regions of regularity of the solution the argument of F lies most probably in [−1, 1], where all the filter functions are practically the same.…”
Section: Filter Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years a general approach to the construction of high-order methods using filters has been proposed by Lions and Souganidis in [17] and further developed by Oberman and Salvador [18]. Let us remind that a typical feature of a filtered scheme S F is that at the node x j the scheme is combination of a high-order scheme S A and a monotone scheme S M according to a filter function F .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crucial point is the coupling between the two schemes which is obtained via a filter function which selects which scheme has to be applied at a node of the grid in order to guarantee (under appropriate assumptions) a global convergence. The construction of these schemes is rather simple as explained by Oberman and Salvador [19] because one can couple various numerical methods and leave the filter function decide the switch between the two schemes. A general convergence result has been proved by Bokanowski, Falcone and Sahu in [5] and recently improved by Falcone, Paolucci and Tozza [11] with an adaptive and automatic choice of the parameter governing the switch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%