2007
DOI: 10.14358/pers.73.2.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtering Airborne Laser Scanning Data with Morphological Methods

Abstract: Filtering methods based on morphological operations have been developed in some previous studies. The biggest challenge for these methods is how to keep the terrain features unchanged while using large window sizes for the morphological opening. Zhang et al. (2003) tried to achieve this goal, but their method required the assumption that the slope is constant. This paper presents a new method to achieve this goal without such restrictions, and methods for filling missing data and removing outliers are proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
132
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
132
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The crown returns reflected above CBH were transformed to the CHM [32]. The CGV values derived from CHM were calculated using the "Surface Volume Calculation Module" of ArcInfo program [33] (Figure 3(c)).…”
Section: Estimation Of Crown Area and Crown Geometric Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The crown returns reflected above CBH were transformed to the CHM [32]. The CGV values derived from CHM were calculated using the "Surface Volume Calculation Module" of ArcInfo program [33] (Figure 3(c)).…”
Section: Estimation Of Crown Area and Crown Geometric Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflected pulses can be categorized as either first or last pulse returns (Lim et al 2003). Although LIDAR pulses interact with the terrain and all materials above the ground to produce a complex cloud of points, increasingly reliable post-processing procedures for distinguishing between ground and object points are being implemented (e.g., Roggero 2001; Sithole and Vosselman 2004;Chen et al 2007). More advanced LIDAR systems allow multiple returns to be recorded for each emitted pulse.…”
Section: Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most other types of changes can be quantitatively characterized. Such changes can be directly obtained by comparing measurements taken at different times [17][18][19]. Comparison methods include statistical regression models [20][21][22][23], inversion of physical models [24][25][26], or data assimilation [27,28].…”
Section: Contents and Methods In Remote Sensing Of Environmental Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%