2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtering noise for synchronised activity in multi-trial electrophysiology data using Wiener and Kalman filters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MATLAB, data collected at 1000 Hz were downsampled to 500 Hz. The data were detrended using a Kalman filter, and segments containing high-amplitude artifact (> 150 μV) in any channel were excluded from further analysis [22]. Remaining data were broken into 1-s, non-overlapping segments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MATLAB, data collected at 1000 Hz were downsampled to 500 Hz. The data were detrended using a Kalman filter, and segments containing high-amplitude artifact (> 150 μV) in any channel were excluded from further analysis [22]. Remaining data were broken into 1-s, non-overlapping segments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [42], the authors suggest rectifying the EMG signal a priori, which can enhance the muscle activation information but still struggles with high envelope variability [43]. In addition, Kalman and Wiener filter based algorithms have been developed for EMG by many works [44]- [48]. While the traditional Kalman setting has effective tracking when noise is white Gaussian; it provides no meaningful advantage against other methods, since EMG noise is strictly non-white [40].…”
Section: B Envelope Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal Kalman filter (KF) and Wiener filter algorithms have been developed for EMG signals by many authors [25][26][27][28][29]. Although the classic KF setting allows achieving a maximum estimation accuracy, noise is required to be white Gaussian with known statistics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%