2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23826-5_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtration Algorithms for Approximate Order-Preserving Matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We tested our algorithm SIMD-OPPM against the most effective previous solutions, which include S2OPPM and S4OPPM [4], SSEOPPM and AVXOPPM [5], FFK-OPPM [13], and SKIP-OPPM [12]. S2OPPM and S4OPPM [4] solutions are based on SBNDM2 and SBNDM4 [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We tested our algorithm SIMD-OPPM against the most effective previous solutions, which include S2OPPM and S4OPPM [4], SSEOPPM and AVXOPPM [5], FFK-OPPM [13], and SKIP-OPPM [12]. S2OPPM and S4OPPM [4] solutions are based on SBNDM2 and SBNDM4 [19].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S2OPPM and S4OPPM [4] solutions are based on SBNDM2 and SBNDM4 [19]. SSEOPPM and AVXOPPM [5] represent the online solution grounded on SSE4.2 and AVX instruction set, respectively. FFK-OPPM [13] presents the filtration approach by Faro and Külekci.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The bottom line is that our index takes roughly the same space as the compressor gzip and can report the order‐preserving occurrences of a pattern an order of magnitude faster than simply scanning the input file. Indeed, in Section 4, we show that our solution is significantly faster than the current fastest online algorithm and the offline algorithm by Chhabra et al, which is also based on the idea of building a “partial” index to speed up the search.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%