Filtration Artifacts Caused by Overloading Membrane Filters

Abstract

The conventional practice of using 0.45 or 0.40 microm membranes to distinguish between the particulate and dissolved phases in natural waters neglects the importance of colloids. Many of the colloids in natural waters pass through 0.45 or 0.40 microm membranes, but a significant fraction at the upper end of the colloidal particle size range is retained. Membrane clogging during filtration decreases the effective pore size and can cause the retention of increasing amounts of colloids. This filtration artifact can cause serious errors in sampling and in assigning trace metals to various particle size classes. We evaluated the effect of membrane loading for two common membrane types (0.45 microm Millipore Durapore and 0.40 microm Nuclepore) on the retention of colloidal Fe, Al, Mn, and OM in three Connecticut rivers. In addition, we used a 1.0 microm Nuclepore membrane to estimate the amount of colloids in the 0.40-1.0 microm size fraction that are retained by membranes during conventional filtration. All samples were collected with clean techniques, and all filtrations were carried out in a class 100 clean room. A peristaltic pump, set at an initial flow rate of 120 mL/min, was used to pump samples through 47 mm diameter inline Teflon filter holders. Back pressure and flow rate were monitored during filtration, and both are good indicators for the onset of membrane clogging. The results show a consistent correlation between increasing back pressure and decreasing concentration of colloidal Fe and sometimes Al, Mn, and OM in the filtrate for all membrane types. Although the shape of the loading-retention curves varied dramatically by site and by membrane type, the essential relationship between back pressure, flow rate, and filtration artifacts during membrane clogging remained the same.

Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment

“…Comparative data obtained for soil suspensions, for filtration and sedimentation FFF indicates that membrane filtration can both over-and under-estimate smaller size fractions due to clogging as well as electrostatic interactions (Gimbert et al 2005). Microfiltration with pore sizes 40.1 mm is a simple and common method, although exhibiting many artifacts caused by, for example, filter-cake formation and concentration polarization (Morrison and Benoit 2001). Ultrafiltration is applicable for large sample volumes; however, with decreasing pore sizes, common filtration artifacts are even more likely.…”

Fractionation of iron species and iron isotopes in the Baltic Sea euphotic zone

“…The reason for this was to reduce the removal of colloids that is caused by clogging of filters, i.e. colloids will be discriminated in the filtrate when the filter gets clogged (Morrison and Benoit, 2001). Filtrate from several filtrations was collected in 25 L polyethylene containers from which sub samples for dissolved iron (DFe), Flow Field-Flow Fractionation (FIFFF), and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) analysis were taken.…”

Chemical Quality Status of Rivers for the Water Framework Directive: A Case Study of Toxic Metals in North West England

“…It excludes the more refractory and acid-unreactive components of the suspended sediments. Although, reference is also given to a dissolved fraction, for many transition metal components in particular, this fraction also comprises colloidal material that is not "truly" dissolved [18,19]. For the analysis, the instruments are optimized for low concentrations of trace metals and calibrated on the day of use using a range of standard solutions.…”