1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf00585685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtration in surface glomeruli as regulated by flow rate through the loop of henle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, during volume expansion the GFR is high, and a large load of fluid is passing through the whole nephron (Persson, Schnerman & Wright 1974, Ploth et al 1978, Moore et al 1980. The existence of a tubuloglomerular feedback control that can adjust the GFR in accordance with the distal delivery of fluid has been well documented (Schnermann, Persson & Agerup 1973, Hierholzer et al 1974. In earlier studies it was found that the sensitvity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism was reduced during saline volume expansion and plasma volume expansion, allowing more fluid to pass through the distal tubule without reducing the GFR (Persson, Schnermann & Wright 1974, Ploth et al 1978, Moore et al 1980.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, during volume expansion the GFR is high, and a large load of fluid is passing through the whole nephron (Persson, Schnerman & Wright 1974, Ploth et al 1978, Moore et al 1980. The existence of a tubuloglomerular feedback control that can adjust the GFR in accordance with the distal delivery of fluid has been well documented (Schnermann, Persson & Agerup 1973, Hierholzer et al 1974. In earlier studies it was found that the sensitvity of the tubuloglomerular feedback mechanism was reduced during saline volume expansion and plasma volume expansion, allowing more fluid to pass through the distal tubule without reducing the GFR (Persson, Schnermann & Wright 1974, Ploth et al 1978, Moore et al 1980.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simi larly, Maddox et al [22] found no difference between snGFR measured at proximal and distal sites using the conventional technique in either uninephrectomized plasma-loaded rats or in normal hyropenic rats. In contrast, Hierholzer et al [2] reported that snGFRprox increased when the loop of Henle was not perfused. However, the difference between snGFR measured with and without loop per fusion was statistically significant only when it was factored by whole kidney GFR and body weight.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The prediction that snGFRprox exceeds snGFRdis as determined using conventional techniques has received a great deal of atten tion [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][19][20][21][22][23]. Intratubular injection of a column of oil at the puncture site interrupts flow distally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specific changes in the individual determinants of SNGFR [nephron plasma flow (SNPF), transcapillary hydrostatic pressure gradient (AP), glomerular ultrafiltration coeffi cient (LpA), and systemic plasma oncotic pressure (tca)] responsible for the decline in nephron filtration rate associated with TGF have been evaluated by a number of investigators. Despite some discordance among the results of the various studies pertaining to this matter, evidence has accrued to implicate both afferent and efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction [20][21][22][23] as well as decline in LpA [22,24] in the glomerular response to perfusion of the macula densa. It has also been demon strated that angiotensin II (All), a hormone capable of mediating efferent arteriolar vasoconstriction and de creases in L.pA (presumably by causing mesangial cells to contract) [25], must be present in renal tissue in order for a TGF response to occur [26,27], suggesting that the intrarenal concentration of, or the glomerular sensitivity to All might be modulated by the TGF system.…”
Section: The Tgf Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%