2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtration of nano-aerosol using nanofiber filter under low Peclet number and transitional flow regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
124
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
124
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, a number of studies have been conducted with the goal of determining the filtration efficiency of nanofiber filters (Podgórski et al, 2006;Qin and Wang, 2006;Yun et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2008;Hung and Leung, 2011). For example, Podgórski et al (2006) employed fibrous filters that were composed of microfibers and nanofibers, with the mean fiber diameter varying from 0.74 µm to 1.41 µm, and that were produced by means of a melt-blown method for removing nanoparticles with diameters in the range of 10 nm to 500 nm in diameter.…”
Section: Advances In Nanoparticle Filtration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of studies have been conducted with the goal of determining the filtration efficiency of nanofiber filters (Podgórski et al, 2006;Qin and Wang, 2006;Yun et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2008;Hung and Leung, 2011). For example, Podgórski et al (2006) employed fibrous filters that were composed of microfibers and nanofibers, with the mean fiber diameter varying from 0.74 µm to 1.41 µm, and that were produced by means of a melt-blown method for removing nanoparticles with diameters in the range of 10 nm to 500 nm in diameter.…”
Section: Advances In Nanoparticle Filtration Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The curves show general agreement with the respective experimental results while the estimated pressure drops have a discrepancy less than 11% from the experimental values. The modeled curves are close to each other for particles bigger than 100 nm, since the aerosol velocity affects the filtration efficiency of diffusion much more than that of interception (Hung and Leung 2011). …”
Section: Filtration Tests At Different Face Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In our research, the initial charged TPFs most efficiently removed particles at 2% TiO 2 loading, and the particle penetration (20-500 nm) was 1.83%. The increased efficiency may be attributed to the additional TiO 2 content on the TPFs, and TiO 2 potentially enhances the material surface area and provides additional active adsorption sites for particle removal (Hung et al, 2011). Surface roughness also allows the formation of an enlarged nonslip zone and expands the stagnation zone (Lamb et al, 1975).…”
Section: Effect Of Tio 2 Loadingmentioning
confidence: 99%