1955
DOI: 10.1080/00966665.1955.10467674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Filtration of Radioactive Aerosols By Glass Fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1963
1963
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Juvinal et al (1970) provide an extensive literature review of fixed bed collection. Blasewitz and Judson (1955) compared the performance of glass fiber filters and sand bed filters for the removal of methylene blue aerosols from gas streams flowing at 1.5 to 2.0 cm/sec. Thomas and Yoder (1956) collected DOP aerosol in sand filters and on lead shot at low flow velocities; aerosol collection efficiencies increased when the bed operating mode was changed from an upflow pattern to a downflow pattern indicating gravity settling.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Juvinal et al (1970) provide an extensive literature review of fixed bed collection. Blasewitz and Judson (1955) compared the performance of glass fiber filters and sand bed filters for the removal of methylene blue aerosols from gas streams flowing at 1.5 to 2.0 cm/sec. Thomas and Yoder (1956) collected DOP aerosol in sand filters and on lead shot at low flow velocities; aerosol collection efficiencies increased when the bed operating mode was changed from an upflow pattern to a downflow pattern indicating gravity settling.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eight fiber types gave promise of efficiencies approaching that of a HEPA filter. Only one, the Owens Corning Fiberglas• type 115K, was satisfactory under field conditions (Blasewitz et al 1951). A permanent curl in this fiber is the key to performance of the 115K fiber.…”
Section: Deep-bed Glass-fiber Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Installed DBGF Filters DBGF units as large as 150,000 cfm are in building and cell-exhaust installations (Burchsted et al 1976). A 126,000 cfm unit is in the canyon exhaust at Hanford (Blasewitz 1951), and a 150,000-cfm unit is in the Idaho Chemical Plant at Idaho National Engineering laboratory.…”
Section: Advantages/disadvantages Of Dbgf Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration superficial velocity is defined as the actual volumetric flow rates through the filter divided by the cross-sectional area of the filtration zone. In the studies on fixed beds of glass fibers, Blasewitz and Judson [18] discovered that the collection efficiency dropped with increasing filtration superficial velocity. On the other hand, Moresco and Cooper [19] developed a correlation form for penetration showing that high Stokes number and high filtration superficial velocity caused the increase of collection efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%