2008
DOI: 10.1097/opx.0b013e31816bea0f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fimbrolide-Coated Antimicrobial Lenses: Their In Vitro and In Vivo Effects

Abstract: Fimbrolide-coated lenses show promise as an antibacterial and anti-acanthamoebal coating on contact lenses and appear to be safe when worn on the eye in an animal model.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,28 The incidence of fungal or amoebal keratitis during lens wear still remains much lower than for bacterial keratitis 1,4 but these continue to be difficult infections to diagnose and manage. 29,30 Strategies that have been designed to prevent microbial colonization of contact lenses include incorporation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), 31,32 phosphorylcholine, 33 fimbrolides, 34 silver, 35 selenium, 36 antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMP), 37,38 or high density poly (ethylene oxide) dialdehyde (PEO(ALD) 2 ). 39 However, disadvantages of these technologies are that NSAIDs and silver need to be released from lenses to retain activity, and so might lose activity during use; PEO(ALD) 2 and phosphorylcholine coatings are passive anti-adhesive agents (i.e., do not contain inherent antimicrobial activity).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10,28 The incidence of fungal or amoebal keratitis during lens wear still remains much lower than for bacterial keratitis 1,4 but these continue to be difficult infections to diagnose and manage. 29,30 Strategies that have been designed to prevent microbial colonization of contact lenses include incorporation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), 31,32 phosphorylcholine, 33 fimbrolides, 34 silver, 35 selenium, 36 antimicrobial cationic peptides (AMP), 37,38 or high density poly (ethylene oxide) dialdehyde (PEO(ALD) 2 ). 39 However, disadvantages of these technologies are that NSAIDs and silver need to be released from lenses to retain activity, and so might lose activity during use; PEO(ALD) 2 and phosphorylcholine coatings are passive anti-adhesive agents (i.e., do not contain inherent antimicrobial activity).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This activity was much higher than that previously reported for fimbrolide-coated contact lenses (70% inhibition) against Acanthamoeba trophozoites. 34 Development of bacterial resistance against conventional antibiotics is a major problem. Resistance increases the risk of treatment failure with potentially serious consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this approach limits environmental contamination, it has not been successfully pursued. The techniques have been used effectively against bacterial biofouling on biomedical devices (Hume et al 2004;Zhu et al 2008) and this is an area of technical promise with the move towards legislation restricting antifouling technologies to non-release mechanisms.…”
Section: Non-leaching Biocidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An arbitrary value of 0.7 was used as an indicator in this assay for assessing the "acceptable level" of cell inhibition [29,30]. A comparison between PU and PUNCs fabricated either as films or coatings is shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Cell Growth Inhibition (Cgi)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CGI was expressed as a ratio of the number of cells in test material to the number of cells in PU control. A ratio of 0.7 or higher was considered an 'acceptable level' of cell growth inhibition within this assay [29,30]. Materials were performed in triplicates and the assay was repeated in triplicates.…”
Section: Cell Growth Inhibition (Cgi) Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%