[Proceedings] the 14th IEEE/NPSS Symposium Fusion Engineering
DOI: 10.1109/fusion.1991.218705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final optics for laser-driven inertial fusion reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wedgelets are inclined at Brewster's angle with respect to the beam direction and held at Tfo -400°C to anneal neutron generated colour centres [20]. Without this continuous annealing, fused silica would deteriorate in minutes at any practical distance from the target (in about 5 min for our baseline design, which has about 6 X lOI3 neutrons/(cm2 s) at the final optic), because optical degradation at 3w begins at about 10l6 neutrons/cm* [69].…”
Section: Final Optics Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wedgelets are inclined at Brewster's angle with respect to the beam direction and held at Tfo -400°C to anneal neutron generated colour centres [20]. Without this continuous annealing, fused silica would deteriorate in minutes at any practical distance from the target (in about 5 min for our baseline design, which has about 6 X lOI3 neutrons/(cm2 s) at the final optic), because optical degradation at 3w begins at about 10l6 neutrons/cm* [69].…”
Section: Final Optics Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without this continuous annealing, fused silica would deteriorate in minutes at any practical distance from the target (in about 5 min for our baseline design, which has about 6 X lOI3 neutrons/(cm2 s) at the final optic), because optical degradation at 3w begins at about 10l6 neutrons/cm* [69]. Degradation begins at even lower neutron fluences for shorter laser wavelengths; specifically, the absorptivity of fused silica is roughly 60 times larger at KrF wavelengths (248 nm) than it is at 349 nm [20]. Consequently, to keep a COE comparable to our baseline result and to avoid extremely large target chamber buildings, DPSSL*IFE results indicate that operation at 248 nm would require the temperature of the final optic to be z 1000°C.…”
Section: Final Optics Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we evaluate the COE equation given in Sec. 3 for Pne = 1 GW, it indicates that the COE is approximately equal to a constant plus 1.5 times the TCC in G$. Using this approximation, the COE can be given by the following expression: In the above equation, the second term on the r i~t is the non-constant part of the cost of the target chamber and the BOP (where 2.14/qG is the recycled power hction for a thermal-to-electric conversion efficiency of 45%, divided by 0.96 for a 4y0 auxiliary power fraction).…”
Section: Simple Model For the Coementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical physics bears much in common, including pumping, extraction, pulse 1 21 Flashlamus + diodes The longevity, reliability, high efficiency, architectural flexibility, and low thermal loading of diodes now allow us to design DPSSLS suitable for IFE. The estimated number of shots required over the %year lifetime of the power plant with a driver operating at 10 Hz is about lO1l0. Laser diode lifetimes are presently within reach of this goal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%