2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Overall Survival Analysis of the SOGUG Phase 2 MAJA Study: Maintenance Vinflunine Versus Best Supportive Care After First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were randomized to receive second-line vinflunine (every 21 days as a 20-min intravenous infusion at 320 mg/m 2 or at 280 mg/m 2 ) plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. One patient was lost immediately to follow-up and nine discontinued treatment due to toxicity or patient decision [ 12 , 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patients were randomized to receive second-line vinflunine (every 21 days as a 20-min intravenous infusion at 320 mg/m 2 or at 280 mg/m 2 ) plus best supportive care or best supportive care alone. One patient was lost immediately to follow-up and nine discontinued treatment due to toxicity or patient decision [ 12 , 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance therapy can be a useful treatment strategy to delay disease progression, improve quality of life, and increase overall survival both in patients with metastatic disease who are not eligible for second-line treatment but who might still expect some clinical benefit and in those who are eligible for second-line treatment but at risk of rapid disease progression [ 15 , 16 ]. In a previous randomized, controlled, open-label, phase II trial of aUCC patients with controlled disease after first-line cisplatin and gemcitabine, we demonstrated that maintenance therapy with vinflunine plus best supportive care resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival than best supportive care alone, with no unexpected long-term adverse effects [ 12 , 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62,63 However, phase 3 trials of non-ICI maintenance treatments in advanced UC were negative (lapatinib or sunitinib) or resulted in a PFS benefit but not an OS improvement (vinflunine). [64][65][66][67] A randomized phase 2 trial performed in the United States assessed pembrolizumab maintenance versus placebo in 108 patients with advanced UC that had not progressed after 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab maintenance significantly prolonged PFS compared with placebo, which was the primary endpoint of the trial.…”
Section: Javelin Bladder 100: Avelumab 1l Maintenance Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance therapy following platinum-containing chemotherapy is an established treatment strategy in other tumor types, including pemetrexed in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and poly(ADPribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer [58][59][60][61][62]. Previous trials of switch-maintenance therapy in advanced UC using nonimmunotherapy approaches (ie, lapatinib, sunitinib, and vinflunine) did not show significantly improved OS, with only vinflunine showing a PFS benefit [63][64][65][66]. Administering an ICI in sequence via a 1L maintenance approach may provide treatment benefits that cannot be achieved with combination therapy.…”
Section: Exploiting the Complementary Effects Of Chemotherapy And Icis In Advanced Ucmentioning
confidence: 99%