2016
DOI: 10.2172/1350591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Project Report on RCCS Testing with Air-based NSTF

Abstract: Impact of 33% break initiated at t=57.6min. Average riser ∆T saw a 7.4 • C rise . . . 191 Impact of 33% break initiated at t=57.6min. Average riser heat flux saw a -9.33%

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HTGRs appeal to the nuclear industry due to their inherent safety features, high thermal-to-electric conversion efficiency, and the ability to provide high-temperature process heat (Wang et al (2021)). Many HTGR designs rely on the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) for passive decay heat removal and safe reactor shutdown during accident scenarios due to its relatively simple design, the reliance on natural forces, and the potential for high levels of performance (Lisowski et al (2016)). The RCCS is designed to ensure that the vessel wall and the fuel peak temperature are maintained at safe limits during normal operation and accident scenarios, to maintain the reactor cavity concrete and support structures at safe limits, to sustain the intended function and performance across the 40-year life span of a reactor installation, and to accomplish the above functions without human intervention or active systems (Lisowski et al (2016)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HTGRs appeal to the nuclear industry due to their inherent safety features, high thermal-to-electric conversion efficiency, and the ability to provide high-temperature process heat (Wang et al (2021)). Many HTGR designs rely on the Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) for passive decay heat removal and safe reactor shutdown during accident scenarios due to its relatively simple design, the reliance on natural forces, and the potential for high levels of performance (Lisowski et al (2016)). The RCCS is designed to ensure that the vessel wall and the fuel peak temperature are maintained at safe limits during normal operation and accident scenarios, to maintain the reactor cavity concrete and support structures at safe limits, to sustain the intended function and performance across the 40-year life span of a reactor installation, and to accomplish the above functions without human intervention or active systems (Lisowski et al (2016)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For HTGRs, there are mainly two RCCS designs as shown in Figure 5 which as currently under discussion: an air-cooled system initially proposed by GA [24] and an active, cold (<30°C), constant water flow system proposed by AREVA [25]. The Natural Convection Shutdown Heat Removal Test Facility (NSTF) at Argonne National Laboratory has conducted both air-based and water-based RCCS experiments since 2016 [26,27] to support the DOE vision of aiding U.S. vendors in designing future reactor concepts, advancing the maturity of codes for licensing, and ultimately developing safe and reliable reactor technologies.…”
Section: Reactor Cavity Cooling Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further work is required to better capture the stored energy within a fuel pebble when using the 2-D porous medium model. The Natural convection Shutdown heat removal Test Facility (NSTF) is a large-scale thermal-hydraulics test facility built at Argonne National Laboratory to study the performance of passive safety systems for advanced nuclear reactors [12]. It was designed to provide highquality experiment data for validating the performance of Reactor Cavity Cooling System (RCCS) concepts for decay heat removal in advanced nuclear reactors.…”
Section: Coupled 2-d/1-d Primary System Modeling Demonstrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 shows the transient outlet cooling water temperature and the heat flux output to cooling water in the null-transient simulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%