2010
DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/47/1a/07009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final report on supplementary comparison APMP.M.P-S8 in hydraulic gauge pressure from 100 MPa to 1000 MPa

Abstract: This report describes the results of a supplementary comparison of hydraulic high-pressure standards at two national metrology institutes (NMIs) – National Metrology Institute of Japan, AIST (NMIJ/AIST) and Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Germany – which was carried out during the period January 2007 to March 2007 within the framework of the Asia-Pacific Metrology Programme (APMP) and the European Association of National Metrology Institutes (EURAMET) in order to determine their degrees of equival… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First experimental characterisation of multipliers 111 and 112 was performed immediately after their manufacture by Fluke in 500 MPa pressure range with the results [1] At PTB, the multipliers were calibrated in 1 GPa pressure range using as a reference PTB 200 MPa and 1 GPa pressure balances, which had been studied in detail and participated in several key comparisons [11,12,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The 1 GPa and 200 MPa standards were connected to the HP and LP sides of multipliers using DHS in all instruments.…”
Section: Experimental Characterisation Of the 16 Gpa Pressure Multipl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First experimental characterisation of multipliers 111 and 112 was performed immediately after their manufacture by Fluke in 500 MPa pressure range with the results [1] At PTB, the multipliers were calibrated in 1 GPa pressure range using as a reference PTB 200 MPa and 1 GPa pressure balances, which had been studied in detail and participated in several key comparisons [11,12,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The 1 GPa and 200 MPa standards were connected to the HP and LP sides of multipliers using DHS in all instruments.…”
Section: Experimental Characterisation Of the 16 Gpa Pressure Multipl...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the international comparisons in which AIST had participated and the ones in progress. AIST organized the international comparison as the pilot institute in the majority of the APMP international comparisons, and engaged in the creation of the execution schedule, drafting of the measurement manual, preparation of the transfer device and the property evaluation, organization of the comparison results, and the write-up of the final report [19]- [22] . In the international comparisons organized by AIST, the digital pressure gauge was used actively as the transfer device to enhance efficiency, as mentioned in subchapter 6.2.…”
Section: T I O N Va Lu E Of T H E R E M O T E C a Li B R A T I O N Wamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical dial type pressure gauges have recently been used as TSs for the evaluation of participating laboratory's performance through interlaboratory comparison [7][8] in the pressure range up to 70 MPa within the accuracy limit of +0.25% of full scale or coarser. The strain gauge type PTs have also been used very sparingly but for high pressure ranges up to 1.4 GPa [9][10]. The capacitance type PT as TS has also been used and produces accurate and repeated results up to 500 MPa [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%