2014
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt523
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final results from a randomized phase 3 study of FOLFIRI ± panitumumab for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
116
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
9
116
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Among all RAS wild-type (KRAS at exon 2, 3, 4 and NRAS 2, 3, 4) patients, benefits were observed in PFS when treated with FOLFIRI/panitumumab versus FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (17). Similar to results in other studies, the addition of an anti-EGFR therapy to standard chemotherapy provided no statistically significant benefit in terms of OS, PFS, or RR in the presence of any RAS mutation.…”
Section: Primary and Acquired Resistance To Biologic Therapies In Gassupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among all RAS wild-type (KRAS at exon 2, 3, 4 and NRAS 2, 3, 4) patients, benefits were observed in PFS when treated with FOLFIRI/panitumumab versus FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (17). Similar to results in other studies, the addition of an anti-EGFR therapy to standard chemotherapy provided no statistically significant benefit in terms of OS, PFS, or RR in the presence of any RAS mutation.…”
Section: Primary and Acquired Resistance To Biologic Therapies In Gassupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Treatment with anti-EGFR therapy did not significant improve median PFS or OS. FOLFIRI/ panitumumab versus FOLFIRI alone was examined in the second-line setting by Peeters and colleagues (17). The presence of a BRAF mutation resulted in no significant differences in PFS or OS whether patients were treated with FOLFIRI/panitumumab or FOLFIRI alone, indicating BRAF mutations may confer EGFR therapy resistance although this study was not powered for this purpose.…”
Section: Brafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Im Vergleich zur alleinigen Chemotherapie wurde durch Zugabe eines anti-EGFR-Antikörpers keine Verbesserung von PFS (HR 1,12, p = 0,20) oder OS (HR 1,08, p = 0,14) beobachtet. Vergleichbare Daten wurden für das Gesamtüberleben auch in der Zweitlinientherapie (OS: HR 0,93, p = 0,482) gefunden [1046]. Bei intensiv vorbehandelten Patienten und Vorliegen einer KRAS-Mutation konnte durch Cetuximab im Vergleich zu "best supportive care" (BSC) kein Überlebensvorteil erreicht werden (HR 1,01, p = 0,97), während eine hochgsignifikante OS-Verlänge-rung bei Patienten mit KRAS-Wildtyp-Tumoren beobachtet wurde (HR 0,55, p < 0,001) [1047].…”
Section: Ras-mutationunclassified
“…In the second-line setting, panitumumab has been tested in combination with FOLIFIRI versus FOLFIRI alone in KRAS wild-type patients. This trial demonstrated an improvement in PFS for patients treated with the combination (6.7 vs 4.9 months; HR: 0.82; p = 0.0023) and a trend toward longer OS but without statistical significance [69]. The need for a more precise selection of mCRC patient candidates for anti-EGFR treatment has been confirmed by the analysis of the results of the FIRE-3 trial, in which 592 KRAS wild-type mCRC patients were randomised to receive FOLFIRI plus either cetuximab or bevacizumab as first-line treatment.…”
Section: Anti-egfr (Cetuximab Panitumumab)mentioning
confidence: 84%