2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2011.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Results from the High solution Flyʼs Eye (HiRes) Experiment

Abstract: Final results from the High Resolution Fly's Eye (HiRes) on the observation of the Greisen-Zatsepin-Kuzmin cutoff in the cosmic ray spectrum are presented. We observe a cutoff consistent with the GZK predictions with a five sigma significance. The nature of the cosmic ray composition near the GZK cutoff is also discussed as well as possible correlations of the highest energy cosmic rays with AGNs and LSS in the Northern sky.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(This is compatible with the 22% margins allowed by PAO for systematic errors.) Such upscaling in energies, from the one side, renders the PAO data compatible with the data accumulated by other experiments HiRes [48] and TA [49], in the energy range E < 20 EeV where all experiments reached very good accuracy, and on the other side, with the spectral characteristics predicted by dip model that considers protons as the cosmic ray carriers [40]. One can immediately observe that the standard UHECR spectrum (the red solid curve our GZK on Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(This is compatible with the 22% margins allowed by PAO for systematic errors.) Such upscaling in energies, from the one side, renders the PAO data compatible with the data accumulated by other experiments HiRes [48] and TA [49], in the energy range E < 20 EeV where all experiments reached very good accuracy, and on the other side, with the spectral characteristics predicted by dip model that considers protons as the cosmic ray carriers [40]. One can immediately observe that the standard UHECR spectrum (the red solid curve our GZK on Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, we consider that it would be premature to claim that the problem is solved until the experimental situation is not well settled. A controversy concerning the shape and chemical composition of the UHECR spectrum between the PAO data from one side, and the data of HiRes [48] and TA [49] on the other side, is not yet resolved (see e.g. [50]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HiRes interpretation of the measured depth of shower maximum (X max ) and its fluctuations was that all UHECR are Hydrogen nuclei (protons) (Sokolsky, 2011), while Auger interpreted its results as a chemical composition becoming increasingly heavier with energy above 2×10 18 eV (Kampert&Unger, 2012). The interpretation of the chemical composition from the X max measurement depends on the hadronic interaction model used which creates a significant systematic error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9). At the same time HiRes [17] and Auger [18] data on Xmax distribution favor a light (predominantly proton) primary composition near 10 18 eV. The last measurements of muon energy spectrum above 100 TeV [19] also showed serious deviations from usual energy spectrum (Fig.…”
Section: Epj Web Of Conferencesmentioning
confidence: 76%