2005
DOI: 10.3816/cbc.2005.n.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Final Results of a Phase II Trial of Preoperative TAC (Docetaxel/Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide) in Stage III Breast Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Smaller studies using other highly active regimens have achieved similar results. Doxorubicin and docetaxel given for six cycles achieved a pathological complete response rate of 8% as did docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (22,23). This compares favorably with the 31% (clinical complete response), 10% (pathological complete response in breast), and 7% (pathological complete response in breast and nodes) rates seen in our study with four cycles of docetaxel and capecitabine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Smaller studies using other highly active regimens have achieved similar results. Doxorubicin and docetaxel given for six cycles achieved a pathological complete response rate of 8% as did docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (22,23). This compares favorably with the 31% (clinical complete response), 10% (pathological complete response in breast), and 7% (pathological complete response in breast and nodes) rates seen in our study with four cycles of docetaxel and capecitabine.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Both the ORR (88% versus 78%) and the pCR rate (8% versus 12%) were comparable for AT and for AC, respectively. A phase II study demonstrated that a combination of docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) conferred ORR of 81% and pCR of 8% [38]. This does not appear to improve upon the historical experience with AC neoadjuvant therapy or with the findings of docetaxel monotherapy reported in the present study.…”
Section: Safetycontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Although the addition of taxanes induced an increase in the pCR rate [30] in comparison with standard anthracycline-based regimens, its impact, particularly in sequence regimens, on the outcome in stage III B is unclear, since few series have examined this group of patients independently from those with other LABC (as T3 or any T, N2–3). With the TAC regimen, von Minckwitz et al [42] and O’Regan et al [43] showed pCR rates of only 6.7 and 10%, respectively, in the subgroup of patients with stage III B disease, not greater than with ‘old standard’ regimens [5, 7]. No pCRs were seen with the TEC regimen (docetaxel, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide) for 6 cycles in stage IIIB, as reported by Burdette-Radoux et al [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%