2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10389-023-01981-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial burden of injury care in India: evidence from a nationally representative sample survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that utilization of health care services from private health facilities puts an exorbitant burden on households in concordance with previous studies. 31,33,34,53,54,75 We also found deleterious effect of utilizing private health facilities across all states/UTs. However, the burden was more pronounced in poorer states such as Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Odisha, and Bihar, where more than 50 percent of households faced CHE incidence and over 20 percent of households were pushed below the poverty line due to seeking care from private health care facilities in the case of both inpatient and outpatient care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that utilization of health care services from private health facilities puts an exorbitant burden on households in concordance with previous studies. 31,33,34,53,54,75 We also found deleterious effect of utilizing private health facilities across all states/UTs. However, the burden was more pronounced in poorer states such as Chhattisgarh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Manipur, Odisha, and Bihar, where more than 50 percent of households faced CHE incidence and over 20 percent of households were pushed below the poverty line due to seeking care from private health care facilities in the case of both inpatient and outpatient care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We used the inflation-adjusted 49 state-specific poverty line for rural and urban areas separately as defined by the Tendulkar Committee, 50 as a proxy of subsistence expenditure, and later multiplied by the household size to obtain the household-level subsistence expenditure. [51][52][53][54] A household was dichotomized as incurring CHE (1 = yes and 0 = no) if their OOPE exceeded 40 percent of capacity to pay 55 as per the following formula:…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%